Document Type : Articles


Educational Technology Department, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran


The purpose of this study was to investigate the factors effecting Information and Communication Technology (ICT) usage in Kharazmi University in Iran and provide insight into the teachers' points of views. Among 300 university teachers, 97 were selected randomly to answer the questionnaire. A researcher-made Likert-type questionnaire was developed using the modules of the ICT Foundation. For comparison and ranking of ICT usage, the Chi square formula and one-way analysis of variance were used. There was significant similarity among the teachers' attitudes in 7 departments about the effects of ICT to use in teaching-learning process.  There was no significant difference between teachers' view points about their enthusiasm of professional use of ICT and to integrate technology in pedagogically sound ways in all faculties. The main priority of Kharazmi University according to the teachers was related to the teachers' attitude to empower ICT approaches through teaching and learning processes. 

  1. Archambault, L. and Crippen, K. (2009): Examining TPACK among K-12 online distance educators in the United States. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9 (1), 71–88.
  2. Askar, P., & Olkun, S. (2005). The use of ICT in schools based on PISA 2003 data. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 19 (5), 15 – 34
  3. Biglari,E. Agahi,H (2010). A study on factors affecting application of Information and Communication Technology (ICT)by faculty members of Razi University Kermanshah. Iranian Research Institute for Science and Technology 26 (1), 29-44. Retrieved from
  4. Chizari, M., Movahed, H.& Lindner, J.R. (2003). The role of internet in educational activities of graduate students at Tehran University; College of Agriculture, Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference Raleigh, North Carolina, USA/, April 8- 12, 126-134, Retrieved from http://www/aiaee/org/2003/chizari126- 234
  5. Corrall, Sh. (2008). Information literacy strategy development in higher education: An exploratory study. International Journal of Information Management, 28 (1), 26–37. Retrieved from
  6. Cure F. Ozdener N. (2008) Teacher's success in using ICT and their attitude towards ICT.H. U. Journal of Education, 34 (3), 41-53.
  7. Goos M., Galbraith P.,Renshaw, P., & Geiger, V. (2003). Perspectives on technology mediated learning in secondary school mathematics classrooms. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22 (1), 73-89.
  8. Karagiorgi, Y., Charalambous, K. (2006). ICT in-service training and school practices: in search for the impact. Journal of Education for Teaching, 32 (4), 395- 411
  9. Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P (2005) what happens when teachers design educational technology? the development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32 (2), 131–152.
  10. Koehler, M.J., Mishra, P., & Yahya, K. (2007).Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy, & technology. Computers and Education, 49 (3), 740-762.
  11. Madadi H., Iravani H., Nooghabi S. (2011). Factors have effect on Familiarity and Usage of Information and Communication Technology. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 15 (2011) 3625–3632.Retreived from
  12. Nordin H., Davis N., Ariffin T.F (2013). A case study of secondary pre-service teachers' technological pedagogical and content knowledge mastery level. 13th International Educational Technology Conference. Procedia - social and behavioral sciences 103 (2013)1 – 9.Retreived from
  13. Russell, M., Bebell,D., O'Dwyer,L., &O'Conner.(2003).'Examining teacher technology use: implication for pre-service and in-service teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(4), 297- 310
  14. Shaft, T., Sharfman, M &Wu, W (2004). Reliability assessment of the attitude towards computers instrument (ATCI). Computers in Human Behavior, 20(65), 116-118
  15. Shaunessy, E. (2007). Attitudes toward information technology of teachers of the gifted implications for gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 2 (51), 119-135
  16. Toure, K. (2009). Appropriating technologies and making them work for you in teaching and learning: depth is essential. In T. Karsenti (Ed.), Pedagogical use of ICT: Teaching and Reflecting Strategies (pp. 94-110). Ottawa: IDRC.
  17. Van Brakel, P. A., & Chisenga, J. (2003). Impact of ICT-based distance learning: the African story. The Electronic Library, 21(5): 476-486
  18. Wen, M. (1999). Factor related to use of internet by North Carolina cooperative extension field faculty. Unpublished doctoral dissertation University of North Carolina State, Raleigh/ USA/
  19. Zhang, Y. (2005). Age, gender, and Internet attitudes among employees in the business world, Computers in Human Behavior 21(1), 1-10
  20. Zhou Q., Zhao Y., Hu J., Liu Y, Xing L.(2010) Pre-service chemistry teachers’ attitude toward ICT in Xi’an. Procedia social and behavioral sciences 9 (2010), 1407–1414.Retreived from