Document Type : Articles


1 Department of Information Science and Knowledge Studies; Shahed University; Tehran,

2 Department of Information Science and Knowledge Studies; Shahed University; Tehran, Iran.

3 Graduate in Information Science,


Book social media are reading communities primarily developed as online social networks. This study aims to find precise criteria and indicators for evaluation of book social network and examine and rank the most popular book social networks. The sample population included 10 English and two Persian book/reading social networks publicly available on the Web. A checklist containing 9 main criteria and 35 indicators was built up through a Delphi study and it was used to gather the characteristics of the sample networks. The results indicate that Shelfari has the highest number of features (87%) and therefore it ranks first. In contrast, Bisheh, a Persian social network, contains only 60% of the features and ranks last. The results reveal that there is no meaningful statistical difference among the scores. In other words, all of the twelve book/reading social networks contain almost similar features and have more than 50% of indicators. Several technical indicators were ignored as it was impossible to access and examine inner layers of the studied websites.  In general, Persian book social network scored less than English ones and this can be related to smaller number of audience, little interest in such online communities or language barriers in developing book social networks. These findings can lead to new patterns and recommendations for different societies to improve their book social networks as these websites can encourage reading. Unlike general social networks, little work has been done on book/reading social network in order to reflect their structural functional characteristics. Besides, this paper has resulted in specific criteria and indicators for evaluation of book social networks which can be used as a tool for future studies.

  1. Antosh, M. (2010). Comparative Analysis of the Social Networking Websites LibraryThing and GoodReads. Retrieved April5, 2012 from: /resources/Antosh-Marissa-05.pdf.
  2. Bausells, M. (2014). Top book-recommendation platforms: what are your favourites? The Guardian. May 10th, retrieved June 23, 2014 from: /booksblog/2014/May/10/top-book-recommendation-platforms-what-are-your-favourites
  3. Brandes, U. & Wagner, D. (2004). Visone: Analysis and Visualization of Social Networks In Michael Jünger and Petra Mutzel (Eds.): Graph Drawing Software, 321-340. New York; Springer-Verlag.visone - Analysis and Visualization of Social Networks.
  4. Falahi, K., Atif, Y. & Elnaffar, S. (2010). Social networks: Challenges and new opportunities. In GREENCOM-CPSCOM '10 Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE/ACM Int'l Conference on Green Computing and Communications & Int'l Conference on Cyber, Physical and Social Computing, Dec18-20, 677-804. Hangzhou, China.
  5. Fox, D. & Naidu, S. (2009). Usability evaluation of three social networking Sites. Usability news, 11(1), 1-11.
  6. Fu, F., Liu, L. & Wang, L. (2008). Empirical analysis of online social networks in the age of web2.0. Physica A, 387, 675-684.
  7. Gollner, K., Webster, T. & Nathan, L. (2013). Neighborhood Book Exchange: Community Catalyst of Media Hype? In the Proceedings of iConference’13, 697-700.
  8. Grieshaber, K. (2011). Public bookshelves spread across Germany. Yahoo News, Retrieved from:
  9. Gross, R. & Acquisti, A. (2005). Information revelation and privacy in online social networks (The Facebook-based case, WPES 05. In the Proceedings of the 2005 ACM workshop on privacy in the electronic society (WPES), November 7-10, 71-80. Alexandria, VA, USA.
  10. Hariri, N. & Anbari, A.M. (2013). Evaluation of capabilities of Persian professional web-based social networks and offering suitable solutions to optimize these networks in Iran. Journal of Information Processing and Management, 2(72), 455. (Text in Persian)
  11. Kirch, C. (2013). Building Momentum for Little Free Libraries. Publishers Weekly. February 8th. Retrieved from:
  12. Moradi, K. & Safavi, Z. (2013). Comparative study of Iranian Professional Book Reader network with 3 global book social networks. In the proceedings of 4th Student Conference on Medical Library and Information. Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran. (Text in Persian)
  13. Santolaria, A.M (2009). LibraryThing as a library service: Assessment report. ETH Bibliotheque. Retrieved on March 5, 2016 from: /eth:777/eth-777-01.pdf&embed
  14. Schnitzler, Peter et al (2009). Guideline for evaluating social networks. In W. Abramowicz and D. Flejer (Eds.), Lecture notes in business information proceeding of business information systems workshops, 37(8), 318-329. Poznan, Poland.
  15. Social Networking Evaluation Chart (2008). Digizen. Retrieved April 1, 2016 from:
  16. Thompson, P. (2010). Extending the Reading Experience with Web 2.0 Book-based Groups. Language Arts Journal of Michigan, 25 (2), 43-47.
  17. Top Ten Reviews (2014). Social Networking Websites Review. Retrieved April 15, 2016 from:
  18. Tran, L.A. (2009). Evaluation of community websites: A case study of the community social planning council of Toronto web site. Online Information Review, 33(1), 96-116.
  19. Verdinjad, F. (2011). Virtual social networks and normative challenges. Monthly conference on Library and Information association of Iran, Tehran, 30 November. (Text in Persian)