Document Type : Articles


Bahçeşehir University


Technology companies in a continuous transformation process within the scope of Industry 4.0 practices have followed rapidly changing and developing technological advances closely and have made permanent and successful digital transformation efforts. However, there might be met with resistance of employees sometimes during the digital transformation process. This study examines the user resistance of the employees working at technology companies in Istanbul towards digital transformation and determining user resistance factors. A survey questionnaire was prepared to gather the data. In this regard, The Scale of User Resistance towards Information Systems Implementation developed by Kim & Kankanhalli (2009) with 24 statements was used. The scale has seven dimensions: user resistance, perceived value, switching benefits, switching costs, colleague opinion, self-efficacy for change, and organizational support. The target population of the study consists of the employees working at the technology companies in Istanbul. One of the pioneer companies of the information technology sector was selected as the sample group, and 220 employees attended the research based on voluntariness. SPSS 22.0 program was used for the analysis of the data. According to the results, it was found that the participants have low-level user resistance and adapt to the digital transformation at high-level generally. Furthermore, as the result of hypothesis tests, the findings indicate an effect of perceived value and switching benefits, self-efficacy on user resistance, self-efficacy and organizational support on switching costs, and colleague opinion on perceived value and switching benefits, were reached. At the end of the research, the findings were interpreted via previous research findings. Some recommendations were made for both future studies and the sector on adaptation to the digital transformation.


  1. Armenakis, A. A., Harris, S. G., & Mossholder, K. W. (1993). Creating readiness for organizational-change. Human Relations, 46(6), 681-703.
  2. BCG Focus (2016). Transformation in emerging markets: From growth to competitiveness. [Available online at:] Retrieved on October 15, 2019.
  3. Chawla, A., & Kelloway E. K. (2004). Predicting openness and commitment to change. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 25(6), 485-498.
  4. Dent, E. B., & Goldberg, S. G. (1999). Resistance to change: A limiting perspective. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, (35), 25-41.
  5. Fitzgerald, B. M., Kruschwitz, M., Bonnet, D., & Welch, M. (2013). Embracing digital technology a new strategic imperative. MIT Sloan Management Review Research Report. [Available at:] Retrieved on October 5, 2019.
  6. Joshi, K. (1991). A model of users’ perspective on change: The case of information systems technology implementation. MIS Quarterly, 15(2), 229-242.
  7. Kanar, M. (2006). The relationship between openness to change and employees’ perception of organizational routines and the effects of empowerment. Unpublished master thesis. Marmara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
  8. Kim, H. W., & Kankanhalli, A. (2009). Investigating user resistance to information systems implementation: A status quo bias perspective. MIS Quarterly, 33(3), 567-582.
  9. Lu, Y. (2017). Industry 4.0: A survey on technologies, applications and open research issues. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, (6), 1-10.
  10. Matt, C., Hess, T., & Benlian, A. (2015). Digital transformation strategies. Business Information Systems, 57(5), 339-343.
  11. Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1988). Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, (1), 7-59.
  12. Schallmo, D. R. A, & Williams, C. A. (2018). Digital transformation now. U.S.A.: Springer International Publishing.
  13. Schwab, K. (2016). The fourth industrial revolution. UK: Penguin Group.
  14. Singh, A., & Hess, T. (2017). How chief digital officers promote the digital transformation of their companies. MIS Quarterly Executive, 16(1), 1-17.
  15. Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342-365.
  16. WEF, 2016. Future of jobs report: Employment, skills and workforce strategy for the fourth industrial revolution. Global Challenge Insight Report, (51), 1-157.
  17. Zaltman, G., & Duncan, R. (1977). Strategies for planed change. New York: Wiley