Document Type : Articles


1 Universiti Utara Malaysia

2 Universitas Majalengka


Every single person is entitled to equal space on the roads or sidewalks, so they rely on each other’s empathy and compassion and not be self-centered. Therefore, it is essential to promote the ethics of road safety and road users’ exemplary behavior upmost. This review analyzed the publication trends and thematic evolution of road user behaviour over 47 years from 1973 to 2020. The assessment uses the Scopus database and various bibliometric indicators, such as output growth trends, eminent countries, research hotspots, and author keywords. Also, this study presented a graphical visualization of bibliometric indicators using a VOSviewer. Another bibliometric software tool, known as SciMAT, was used to inspect road user behaviour research’s thematic evolution. The verdicts revealed that the number of publications increased exponentially, starting in 2005 with a hike in publications in 2020. Road user behaviour researches were diverse by examining the various research hotspots. This review also focuses on several themes and dimensions of road user behaviour research. The essential motor theme during the first period (2005-2012) was “schools”. Other motor themes, such as “cross-sectional studies,” “car”, and “space-temporal-analysis”, became the most significant number of publications in the second period (2013-2020). These four themes may be beneficial as a benchmark for researchers focusing on the art of road user behaviour. This bibliometric study provides a comprehensive and in-depth view of road users’ behaviour that may help future researchers advance potential knowledge in this field.   


  1. Abdullah, K. H., & Abd Aziz, F. S. (2020). Safety behaviour in the laboratory among university students. The Journal of Behavioral Science, 15(3), 51-65.
  2. Abdullah, K. H., Hashim, M.N., & Abd Aziz, F. S. (2020). A 39 years (1980-2019) bibliometric analysis of safety leadership research. TEST Engineering and Management, 83, 4526-4542.
  3. Amin, M. T., Khan, F., & Amyotte, P. (2019). A bibliometric review of process safety and risk analysis. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 126, 366-381.
  4. Antin, J. F. (2011). Design of the in-vehicle driving behavior and crash risk study: in support of the SHRP 2 naturalistic driving study. Transportation Research Board.
  5. Artifice, A., Rajaonah, B., Sarraipa, J., Mourad, A., & Jardim-Goncalves, R. (2018, September). Embodied Cognitive Architecture to Support Driver Performance. In 2018 International Conference on Intelligent Systems (IS) (pp. 877-885). IEEE.
  6. Babić, D., Fiolić, M., Babić, D., & Gates, T. (2020). Road markings and their impact on driver behaviour and road safety: a systematic review of current findings. Journal of advanced transportation, 1-19.
  7. Bärgman, J. (2016). Methods for analysis of naturalistic driving data in driver behavior research. Chalmers University of Technology.
  8. Bhalla, K., & Gleason, K. (2020). Effects of vehicle safety design on road traffic deaths, injuries, and public health burden in the Latin American region: a modelling study. The Lancet Global Health, 8(6), 819-828.
  9. Butt, F. M., Ashiq, M., Rehman, S. U., Minhas, K. S., & Khan, M. A. (2020). Bibliometric analysis of road traffic injuries research in the Gulf Cooperation Council region. F1000Research, 9, 1-25.
  10. Campbell, F. B. F., & Campbell, F. (1896). The theory of national and international bibliography: With special reference to the introduction of system in the record of modern literature. Library Bureau.
  11. Cheng, C. K., Li, X. R., Petrick, J. F., & O’Leary, J. T. (2011). An examination of tourism journal development. Tourism Management, 32(1), 53-61.
  12. Cobo, M. J., Lopez-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualising the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the fuzzy sets theory field. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 146-166.
  13. Cole, F. J., & Eales, N. B. (1917). The history of comparative anatomy: Part I.—A statistical analysis of the literature. Science Progress (1916-1919), 11(44), 578-596.
  14. Crawford, F., Watling, D. P., & Connors, R. D. (2018). Identifying road user classes based on repeated trip behaviour using Bluetooth data. Transportation research part A: Policy and Practice, 113, 55-74.
  15. De Oliveira, O. J., da Silva, F. F., Juliani, F., Barbosa, L. C. F. M., & Nunhes, T. V. (2019). Bibliometric Method for Mapping the State-of-the-Art and Identifying Research Gaps and Trends in Literature: An Essential Instrument to Support the Development of Scientific Projects. In Scientometrics Recent Advances. IntechOpen.
  16. Dolan, P., Hallsworth, M., Halpern, D., King, D., Metcalfe, R., & Vlaev, I. (2012). Influencing behaviour: The mindspace way. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33(1), 264-277.
  17. Dragutinovic, N., & Twisk, D. (2006). The effectiveness of road safety education: A literature review. SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research.
  18. Fruhen L. S., Flin R. (2015). Car driver attitudes, perceptions of social norms and aggressive driving behavior towards cyclists.
  19. Accident Analysis Prevention, 83, 162-70.
  20. Ghadban, N. R., Abdella, G. M., Alhajyaseen, W., & Al-Khalifa, K. N. (2018, March). Analysing the impact of human characteristics on the comprehensibility of road traffic signs. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Bandung, Indonesia (pp. 2210-2219).
  21. Ghadban, N. R., Abdella, G. M., Al-Khalifa, K. N., Hamouda, A. M., & Abdur-Rouf, K. B. (2017, July). A real case-based study exploring influence of human age and gender on drivers’ behavior and traffic safety. In International conference on applied human factors and ergonomics (pp. 807-816). Springer, Cham.
  22. Grace, G. C. A. G., Hashmi, S. I., Nawi, N. H. M., Fung, Y. L. V., & Abdibin, S. H. S. J. (2020). Examining the relationship between driving anger and the violation of traffic laws and differences based on gender. International Journal of Road Safety, 1(1), 9-15.
  23. Guo, F., Lv, W., Liu, L., Wang, T., & Duffy, V. G. (2019). Bibliometric analysis of simulated driving research from 1997 to 2016. Traffic injury prevention, 20(1), 64-71.
  24. Haghi, A., Ketabi, D., Ghanbari, G., Rajabi, H. (2014). Assessment of Human Errors in Driving Accident; Analysis of the Causes
  25. Based on Aberrant Behaviors. Life Science Journal, 11(9), 414-420.
  26. Hulse, L. M., Xie, H., & Galea, E. R. (2018). Perceptions of autonomous vehicles: Relationships with road users, risk, gender and age. Safety Science, 102, 1-13.
  27. Intini, P., Colonna, P., & Ryeng, E. O. (2019). Route familiarity in road safety: A literature review and an identification proposal. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 62, 651-671.
  28. Jameel, A. K., & Evdorides, H. (2020). Developing a safer road user behaviour index. IATSS Research, 1-9.
  29. Janstrup, K. H. (2017). Road Safety Annual Report 2017. Technical University of Denmark.
  30. Jing, L., Shan, W., & Zhang, Y. (2021). A bibliometric analysis of road traffic injury research themes, 1928–2018. International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion, 1-10.
  31. Kaye, S. A., Lewis, I., & Freeman, J. (2018). Comparison of self-report and objective measures of driving behavior and road safety: A systematic review. Journal of Safety Research, 65, 141-151.
  32. Ma, L., Guo, H., & Fang, Y. (2021). Analysis of construction workers’ safety behavior based on Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Personality Test in a bridge construction project. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(1), 1-11.
  33. Mahudin, N. D. M., & Sakiman, M. N. (2020). Overworked and unsafe: A comparison of driving behaviour and safety culture according to driver types and working Hours. International Journal of Road Safety, 1(2), 42-48.
  34. Markkula, G., Madigan, R., Nathanael, D., Portouli, E., Lee, Y. M., Dietrich, A., ... & Merat, N. (2020). Defining interactions: A conceptual framework for understanding interactive behaviour in human and automated road traffic. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 21(6), 728-752.
  35. Martin, A. G., Fernandez-Isabel, A., de Diego, I. M., & Beltran, M. (2021). A survey for user behavior analysis based on machine learning techniques: current models and applications. Applied Intelligence, 1-27.
  36. Moan I. S. (2013). Whether or not to ride with an intoxicated driver: Predicting intentions using an extended version of the theory of planned behaviour. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 20, 193-205.
  37. Mohan, D., Khayesi, M., Tiwari, G., & Nafukho, F. M. (2006). Road traffic injury prevention training manual. World Health Organization.
  38. Montoya, F. G., Alcayde, A., Baños, R., & Manzano-Agugliaro, F. (2018). A fast method for identifying worldwide scientific collaborations using the Scopus database. Telematics and Informatics, 35(1), 168-185.
  39. Moral-Munoz, J. A., Arroyo-Morales, M., Piper, B. F., Cuesta-Vargas, A. I., Diaz-Rodriguez, L., Cho, W. C., ... & Cobo, M. J. (2018). Thematic trends in complementary and alternative medicine applied in cancer-related symptoms. Journal of Data and Information Science, 3(2), 1-19.
  40. Najmi, A., Rashidi, T. H., Abbasi, A., & Waller, S. T. (2017). Reviewing the transport domain: an evolutionary bibliometrics and network analysis. Scientometrics, 110(2), 843-865.
  41. Ospina-Mateus, H., Jimenez, L. A. Q., Lopez-Valdes, F. J., & Salas-Navarro, K. (2019). Bibliometric analysis in motorcycle accident research: a global overview. Scientometrics, 121(2), 793-815.
  42. Petridou, E., & Moustaki, M. (2000). Human factors in the causation of road traffic crashes. European Journal of Epidemiology, 16(9), 819-826.
  43. Pino, O., Baldari, F., Pelosi, A., & Giucastro, G. (2014). Risk factors of road crash: An empirical analysis among an Italian drivers sample. International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, 5(4), 301-308.
  44. Prasetijo, J., Musa, I., Sulaiman, N. A., Mustafa, M. A., Putranto, L. S., Hamid, N. B., ... & Abd Latif, M. F. (2020). Red-light running vehicles behaviour based on linear regression approach at traffic lights along Bakau Condong Road, Batu Pahat, Johor. International Journal of Road Safety, 1(1), 4-8.
  45. Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348-349.
  46. Ramlan, R., Irawan, M. Z., & Munawar, A. (2020). Behavioral factors of motorcyclists in right-turn movements at unsignalized intersections: An insight from Yogyakarta, Indonesia. IATSS Research, 1-7.
  47. Reis, H. T., Collins, W. A., & Berscheid, E. (2000). The relationship context of human behavior and development. Psychological Bulletin, 126(6), 844-872.
  48. Rolison, J. J., Regev, S., Moutari, S., & Feeney, A. (2018). What are the factors that contribute to road accidents? An assessment of law enforcement views, ordinary drivers’ opinions, and road accident records. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 115, 11-24.
  49. Rowe, R., Roman, G. D., McKenna, F. P., Barker, E., & Poulter, D. (2015). Measuring errors and violations on the road: A bifactor modeling approach to the driver behavior questionnaire. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 74, 118-125.
  50. SCImago. (2020). SJR — SCImago Journal & Country Rank [Portal]. Retrieved March 3, 2020, from
  51. Sharifi, A., Simangan, D., & Kaneko, S. (2020). Three decades of research on climate change and peace: a bibliometrics analysis. Sustainability Science, 1-17.
  52. Sharma, N., Bairwa, M., Gowthamghosh, B., Gupta, S. D., & Mangal, D. K. (2018). A bibliometric analysis of the published road traffic injuries research in India, post-1990. Health Research Policy and Systems, 16(1), 1-11.
  53. Short, J. R., & Pinet‐Peralta, L. M. (2010). No accident: Traffic and pedestrians in the modern city. Mobilities, 5(1), 41-59.
  54. Singh, H., & Kathuria, A. (2021). Analysing driver behavior under naturalistic driving conditions: A review. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 150, 1-21.
  55. Singh, S. (2015). Critical reasons for crashes investigated in the national motor vehicle crash causation survey (No. DOT HS 812 115).
  56. Sweileh, W. M. (2020). Bibliometric analysis of peer-reviewed literature on food security in the context of climate change from 1980 to 2019. Agriculture and Food Security, 9(1), 1-15.
  57. Sweileh, W., Jabi, S., & Zyoud, S. (2019). Bibliometric analysis of traffic medicine–related publications: 2008–2015. IUG Journal of Natural Studies, 27(1), 53-60.
  58. Taubman–Ben-Ari, O., Eherenfreund–Hager, A., & Prato, C. G. (2016). The value of self-report measures as indicators of driving behaviors among young drivers. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 39, 33-42.
  59. Vaezipour, A., Rakotonirainy, A., Haworth, N., & Delhomme, P. (2017). Enhancing eco-safe driving behaviour through the use of in-vehicle human-machine interface: A qualitative study. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 100, 247-263.
  60. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2019). VOSviewer Manual version 1.6.10. Leiden: Univeristeit Leiden.
  61. Wang, B., Pan, S. Y., Ke, R. Y., Wang, K., & Wei, Y. M. (2014). An overview of climate change vulnerability: A bibliometric analysis based on Web of Science database. Natural Hazards, 74(3), 1649-1666.
  62. Zou, X., Yue, W. L., & Le Vu, H. (2018). Visualisation and analysis of mapping knowledge domain of road safety studies. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 118, 131-145.