Document Type : Articles


Assistant Prof., Marketting University of Gafsa, Institut Supérieur des Études Appliquées en Humanités, Cité des Jeunes, Tunisie.


This paper presents a study of 97 papers classified as review papers by Clarivate's Web of Science. The 97 peer-reviewed papers were published in three prestigious information and library science journals. According to the findings, 57 of the 97 alleged reviews are genuine. 37 research articles, brief communication, case studies, and film reviews are among the 40 papers mislabeled as reviews. The author identifies the causes of these misclassifications, discusses the implications of these misclassifications, and suggests potential solutions to avoid them.


Belter, C. W. (2016). Citation analysis as a literature search method for systematic reviews. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(11), 2766-2777.
Bianchi, F., Grimaldo, F. & Squazzoni, F. (2019). The F3-index. Valuing reviewers for scholarly journals. Journal of Informetrics, 13(1), 78-86.
Birkle, C., Pendlebury, D. A., Schnell, J. & Adams, J. (2020). Web of Science as a data source for research on scientific and scholarly activity. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 363-376.
Blümel, C. & Schniedermann, A. (2020). Studying review articles in scientometrics and beyond: a research agenda. Scientometrics, 124(1), 711-728.
Cleverley, P. H., Burnett, S. & Muir, L. (2017). Exploratory information searching in the enterprise: A study of user satisfaction and task performance. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(1), 77-96.
Colebunders, R., Kenyon, C. & Rousseau, R. (2014). Increase in numbers and proportions of review articles in tropical medicine, infectious diseases, and oncology. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(1), 201-205.
Dondio, P., Casnici, N., Grimaldo, F., Gilbert, N. & Squazzoni, F. (2019). The "invisible hand" of peer review: the implications of author-referee networks on peer review in a scholarly journal. Journal of Informetrics, 13(2), 708-716.
Donner, P. (2017). Document type assignment accuracy in the journal citation index data of Web of Science. Scientometrics, 113(1), 219-236.
Fahimifar, S., Ghorbi, A. & Ausloos, M. (2022). Are we standing on unreliable shoulders? The effect of retracted papers citations on previous and subsequent published papers: A study of the web of science database. International Journal of Information Science and Management, 20(1), 311-325.
Garfield, E. (1987). Reviewing review literature. 1. Definitions and uses of reviews. Essays of an Information Scientist, 10(18), 113-116. Retrieved from
Harzing, A. W. (2013). Document categories in the ISI Web of Knowledge: Misunderstanding the social sciences? Scientometrics, 94(1), 23-34.
Jia, Y. & Liu, I. L. (2018). Do consumers always follow "useful" reviews? The interaction effect of review valence and review usefulness on consumers' purchase decisions. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 69(11), 1304-1317.
Kosztyán, Z. T., Csizmadia, T. & Katona, A. I. (2021). SIMILAR–Systematic iterative multilayer literature review method. Journal of Informetrics, 15(1), 101111.
Lei, L., & Sun, Y. (2020). Should highly cited items be excluded in impact factor calculation? The effect of review articles on journal impact factor. Scientometrics, 122(3), 1697-1706.
Liu, W. (2021). Caveats for the use of Web of Science Core Collection in old literature retrieval and historical bibliometric analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 172, 121023.
Miranda, R. & Garcia-Carpintero, E. (2018). Overcitation and overrepresentation of review papers in the most cited papers. Journal of Informetrics, 12(4), 1015-1030.
Miranda, R. & Garcia-Carpintero, E. (2019). Comparison of the share of documents and citations from different quartile journals in 25 research areas. Scientometrics, 121(1), 479-501.
Moussa, S. (2021). Are FT50 journals really leading? A comment on Fassin. Scientometrics, 126(12), 9613-9622.
Pavel, A. P. (2015). Global university rankings-a comparative analysis. Procedia Economics and Finance, 26, 54-63.
Pranckutė, R. (2021). Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The titans of bibliographic information in today's academic world. Publications, 9(1), 12,
Salloum, S. A., Al-Emran, M., Monem, A. A. & Shaalan, K. (2018). Using text mining techniques for extracting information from research articles. In Intelligent natural language processing: Trends and Applications (pp. 373-397). Springer, Cham.
Seadle, M. (2020). The Great Hack (documentary film). Produced and directed by Karim Amer and Jehane Noujaim. Netflix, 2019. 1 hour 54 minutes. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 71(12), 1507-1511.
Valderrama, Á., Jiménez-Contreras, E., Valderrama, P., Escabias, M. & Baca, P. (2019). Is the trend to publish reviews and clinical trials related to the journal impact factor? Analysis in dentistry field. Accountability in Research, 26(7), 427-438.
Wagner, G., Prester, J., Roche, M. P., Schryen, G., Benlian, A., Paré, G. & Templier, M. (2021). Which factors affect the scientific impact of review papers in IS research? A scientometric study. Information & Management, 58(3), 103427.
Wang, K., Liu, X. & Han, Y. (2019). Exploring Goodreads reviews for book impact assessment. Journal of Informetrics, 13(3), 874-886.
Yeung, A. W. K. (2019). Comparison between Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed and publishers for mislabelled review papers. Current Science, 116(11), 1909-1914. Retrieved from
Zhu, J., Hu, G. & Liu, W. (2019). DOI errors and possible solutions for Web of Science. Scientometrics, 118(2), 709-718.