Knowledge and Use of Google Educational Tools by Postgraduate Students in a Ghanaian University

Document Type : Articles

Authors

1 Senior Assistant Librarian, Library and Information Science, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST), Kumasi, Ghana.

2 Deputy Librarian, Library and Information Science, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST), Kumasi, Ghana.

3 Junior Assistant Librarian, Library and Information Science, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST), Kumasi, Ghana.

Abstract
This study examined postgraduates’ knowledge and usage of Google educational tools. The study was conducted in Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST) with 350 respondents. A purposive sampling technique that allows researchers to use their judgments in selecting participants for research was used to select the participants for this study. A questionnaire was used as the data collection instrument, and it was sent to only the participants who attended a series of information literacy training sessions organized by the authors. The data collected were analyzed using SPSS software. The study revealed that most students use Google as their search engine, and Google Scholar was the most popular Google educational tool. The students gained knowledge of these tools through their colleagues, on their own, through workshops, seminars, and conferences, and their lecturers. The respondents also mentioned some challenges, such as requests to pay to access articles and slow Internet. Some recommendations, such as more education by academic librarians to encourage students to use these free tools and efforts by the students themselves to learn how to use these tools, were made.

Keywords


Abdu, M., Mohammed, S. & Al-jaberi, M. A. (2021). Google Docs or Microsoft Word ? Master ’ s students ’ engagement with instructor written feedback on academic writing in a cross-cultural setting. Computers and Composition, 62, 102672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2021.102672
Almache Granda, G. K. & Ramirez-Avila, M. R. (2020). Classifying vocabulary in Google Sheets to improve word recognition and reading comprehension in EFL learners: An action research study. AtoZ: Novas Práticas Em Informação e Conhecimento, 9(2), 24-31. Retrieved from https://brapci.inf.br/index.php/res/download/148358
Asiedu, N. K., Plockey, F. & Kordie, G. A. (2020). Assessing the information literacy skills of education students in a multi-campus institution. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 4428. Retrieved from and Practice (e-journal). 4428. Retrieved from
Baranova, T., Khalyapina, L. & Yakhyaeva, C. (2019, October). Google products as a source of students' autonomy in content and language integrated learning. In 2019 12th International Conference on Developments in eSystems Engineering (DeSE) (pp. 383-387). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/DeSE.2019.00076
Beaumont, K. (2018). Google Classroom: An online learning environment to support blended learning. Compass: Journal of Learning and Teaching, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.21100/compass.v11i2.837
Bondarenko, O. V., Mantulenko, S. V. & Pikilnyak, A. V. (2018). Google classroom as a tool of support of blended learning for geography students. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2257, 182–191. https://doi.org/10.31812/pedag.v51i0.3671
Borova, T., Chekhratova, O., Marchuk, A., Pohorielova, T. & Zakharova, A. (2021). Fostering students’ responsibility and learner autonomy by using google educational tools. Revista Românească Pentru Educaţie Multidimensională, 13(3), 73–94. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/13.3/441
Brown, M. C. (2018). Google classroom for the online classroom: An accessment. Distance Learning, 15(3), 51–56.
Cancino, M., & Panes, J. (2021). The impact of Google Translate on L2 writing quality measures : Evidence from Chilean EFL high school learners. System, 98, 102464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102464
Charalambous, L. (2018). University of Cyprus Library students’ perception s of information literacy. University of Boras.
Cole, C., Davis, A. R., Eyer, V. & Meier, J. J. (2018). Google Scholar’s coverage of the engineering literature 10 years later. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 44(3), 419-425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2018.02.013
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. (3rd Ed.). Sage Publications.
Dahlen, S. P. C., Haeger, H., Hanson, K. & Montellano, M. (2020). Almost in the wild: Student search behaviors when librarians aren’t looking. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 46(1), 102096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2019.102096
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Fayez, F. & Mahmoud, I. (2015). The impact of Google Docs on student collaboration : A UAE case study. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 7, 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2015.07.004
Fázik, J. & Steinerová, J. (2020). Technologies, knowledge and truth: The three dimensions of information literacy of university students in Slovakia. Journal of Documentation, 77(1), 285-303. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-05-2020-0086
Google (2021a). From the garage to the Googleplex. Retrieved from https://about.google/our-story/
Google (2021b). Education fundamentals. Retrieved from https://edu.google.com/products/workspace-for-education/education-fundamentals/
Groves, M. & Mundt, K. (2015). Friend or foe ? Google Translate in language for academic purposes. English for Specific Purposes, 37, 112–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2014.09.001
Gusenbauer, M. (2019). Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases. Scientometrics, 118, 177–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2958-5
Hamade, L. (2020). The Digital Move towards Online Learning in Lebanon. Business Excellence and Management, 10(S.I. 1), 214–232. Retrieved from https://beman.ase.ro/special_issue_1/17.pdf
Izenstark, A. & Leahy, K. L. (2015). Google classroom for librarians: features and opportunities. Library Hi Tech News, 32(9), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-05-2015-0039
Kocevar-Weidinger, E., Cox, E., Lenker, M., Pashkova-Balkenhol, T. & Kinman, V. (2019). On their own terms: first-year student interviews about everyday life research can help librarians flip the deficit script. Reference Services Review, 47(2), 169–192. https://doi.org/10.1108/rsr-02-2019-0007
Koul, S. & Eydgahi, A. (2017). A systematic review of transcendent states. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 12(4), 19–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.explore.2017.07.007
Kumar, A. R. (2019). Citation-based transparent ranking of Indian Institutes of Technology. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 2409. Retrieved from journal). 2409.
Kunicki, Z. J., Zambrotta, N. S., Tate, M. C., Surrusco, A. R., Risi, M. M. & Harlow, L. L. (2019). Keep your stats in the cloud! evaluating the use of google sheets to teach quantitative methods. Journal of Statistics Education, 27(3), 188–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2019.1665485
Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology. (2021). Basic Statistics for 55th Congregation.
Lee, J., Anderson, A. & Burnett, G. (2014). Peer relationships and information sharing between LIS doctoral students. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 51(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.2014.14505101080
López-fitzsimmons, B. M. & Nagra, K. A. (2019). Google vs. library databases : Engaging twenty- first century undergraduate students in critical thinking. Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, 31(4), 219–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/1941126X.2019.1669959
Luftig, D. & Plungis, J. (2020). OhioLINK librarians and Google Scholar over time : A longitudinal analysis of attitudes and uses. Reference Services Review, 48(4), 683–698. https://doi.org/10.1108/RSR-04-2020-0031
Maheshwary, P. & Bhandari, A. (2019 April). Case-study-google for educatio. In Proceedings of International Conference on Digital Pedagogies (ICDP) http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3375711
Mansor, A. Z. (2012). Managing Student’s Grades and Attendance Records using Google Forms and Google Spreadsheets. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 420–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.296
Mayse, M. (2017). How Google can help promote 21 st century skills. Bulletin of Toyo Gakuen University, 25, 315–332. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/233138607.pdf
Neumann, K. L. & Kopcha, T. J. (2019). Using Google Docs for peer-then-teacher review on middle school students’ writing. Computers and Composition, 54, 102524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2019.102524
Parra, F., Jacobs, A. & Trevino, L. L. (2021). Shippy Express : Augmenting accounting education with Google Sheets. Journal of Accounting Education, 56, 100740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2021.100740
Philbeck, T. & Davis, N. (2019). The Fourth Industrial Revolution: Shaping A New Era: Discovery Service for University of Johannesburg. Journal of International Affairs Editorial Board, 72(1), 17–22. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26588339
Popescu, M. M. (2015). E-Communication , E-Teaching , Age and Gender. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Virtual Learning (pp.135–141). Bucharest University Press. Retrieved from https://euagenda.eu/upload/publications/proceedings-of-the-10th-international-conference-on-virtual-learning-icvl-2015.pdf
Robison, M., Fawley, N. & Marshall, A. (2020). “That background knowledge”: What junior and senior undergraduate transfer students need from their libraries. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 46(1), 102092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2019.102092
Scheef, A. R., & Johnson, C. (2017). The power of the cloud: Google forms for transition assessment. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 40(4), 250-255. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143417700844
Schuster, H. (2010). The use of google services and tools in academic institutions - a critical review. International Review of Law, Computers and Technology, 24(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600860903570129
Stapleton, P., Leung, B. & Kin, K. (2019). Assessing the accuracy and teachers’ impressions of Google Translate : A study of primary L2 writers in Hong Kong. English for Specific Purposes, 56, 18–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2019.07.001
Wu, M. Der & Chen, S. C. (2014). Graduate students appreciate Google Scholar, but still find use for libraries. Electronic Library, 32(3), 375–389. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-08-2012-0102
Zheng, B., Lawrence, J., Warschauer, M. & Lin, C. H. (2015). Middle school students’ writing and feedback in a cloud-based classroom environment. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 20(2), 201–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-014-9239-z
Zheng, Y. (2020). Using mobile donation to promote international fundraising: A situational technology acceptance model. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 14(2), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2020.1720026
Zymovets, O. (2016). Using Google Applications in the Process of Prospective Foreign Language Teachers’ Professional Training. Retrieved from http://eztuir.ztu.edu.ua/bitstream/handle/123456789/5353/39.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

  • Receive Date 16 February 2022
  • Revise Date 23 December 2023
  • Accept Date 23 December 2023