Open Access Mega Journals: Citation Analysis of the Scientific Publications of Selected Middle East Countries

Rostami, Chia; Nemati Anaraki, Leila; Saberi, Mohammad Karim; Sedghi, Shahram

doi:10.22034/ijism.2024.1989974.1043

Open Access Mega Journals: Citation Analysis of the Scientific Publications of Selected Middle East Countries

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Chia Rostami ¹

Leila Nemati Anaraki ²

Mohammad Karim Saberi ³

Shahram Sedghi ⁴

¹ MSC, Medical Library and Information Science, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

² Associate Prof., Health Management and Economics Research Center, Health Management Research Institute, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

³ Associate Prof., Department of Nursing, Shirvan Faculty of Nursing, North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences, Bojnurd, Iran.

⁴ Professor, Department of Medical Library and Information Science, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences. Tehran, Iran.

https://doi.org/10.22034/ijism.2024.1989974.1043

Abstract

Mega journals are growing rapidly, and nowadays, they have become new portals for the publication of scientific outputs. The purpose of this study is to analyze the citations of the scientific outputs of Iran, Turkey, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and Israel in eight mega journals. This applied research, which is a descriptive-analytical study, was conducted by employing a scientometric approach. In this study, eight mega journals were identified and selected based on Bjork's criteria. In each journal, the studies conducted by the researchers of selected countries of the Middle East, and indexed in the Scopus database were searched and extracted from the time the journal was launched as a mega journal to the end of 2019. The total number of studies imported to Excel, SPSS, and VosViewer software for analysis and illustration of the data was 10935. The results showed that approximately 84 percent of the studies performed by the researchers of the selected countries were published in PLOS ONE and Scientific Reports, and the share of the publication for the other six journals accounted for only six percent of the articles. Of the 262696 citations received by these articles, 57.86 percent belonged to the studies published in PLOS ONE. Moreover, PLOS ONE and Scientific Reports were among the most cited sources of the studies carried out in the Middle East. The most active institutes of the Middle East in the eight selected mega journals were Tel Aviv University, King Saud University, Cairo University, and Tehran University of Medical Sciences, respectively. Most of the international collaborations of the selected countries for publication of studies were with the researchers of Medical Sciences of the USA, the UK, and Germany. A considerable share of publications of the selected Middle East countries in the mega journals belonged to PLOS ONE and Scientific Reports. Although the trend of publication in the other journals is also rising, they are not comparable with those two journals. As conducting international studies could increase the rate of citations, it is recommended that researchers increase the impact of their publications via international collaboration.

Keywords

mega journal

citation analysis

open access mega journal

bibliometrics

Middle East

Scientific publications

20.1001.1.20088302.2024.22.3.1.2

Subjects

Library and Information Science

Adkins, D. & Budd, J. (2006). Scholarly productivity of US LIS faculty. Library & Information Science Research, 28(3), 374-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2006.03.021

Amiri, M. R., Saberi, M. K., Ouchi, A., Mokhtari, H. & Barkhan, S. (2023). Publication Performance and Trends in Altmetrics: A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization. International Journal of Information Science and Management (IJISM), 21(1), 97-117. https://doi.org/10.22034/ijism.2022.1977686.0

BasirianJahromi, R., Arfaeinia, H., SeyyedHosseini, S., Torabi, F., Sangari, M. & Khosravi, A. (2022). The articles published in Web of Science by Middle Eastern researchers in waterpipe/cigarette smoking: An altmetrics study. International Journal of Information Science and Management (IJISM), 20(4), 103-116. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.20088302.2022.20.4.7.6

Belinchón, I., Ramos, J. M., Sánchez-Yus, E. & Betlloch, I. (2004). Dermatological scientific production from European Union authors (1987-2000). Scientometrics, 61(2), 271-81. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000041652.90675.d6

Björk, B. C. (2015). Have the “mega-journals” reached the limits to growth? PeerJ, 2015, 26, e981. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.981

Björk, B. C. & Catani, P. (2016). Peer review in megajournals compared with traditional scholarly journals: does it make a difference? Learned Publishing, 29(1), 9-12. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1007

Burns, C. S. (2015). Characteristics of a mega journal: A bibliometric case study. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 3(2), 16-30. https://doi.org/10.1633/JISTaP.2015.3.2.2

Didegah, F. & Didegah, A. (2011). The investigation of scientific publications of Middle East countries in SSCI over the past 30 years. Iranian Journal of Informayion Processing and Management, 26(3), 717-34. Retrieved from https://jipm.irandoc.ac.ir/article_699071_422f0db25545269df41024ce3edfcc88.pdf?lang=en [in Persian]

Domnina, T. N. (2016). A megajournal as a new type of scientific publication. Scientific and Technical Information Processing, 43(4), 241-250.

Erfanmanesh, M. A. (2019). Quantitative portrait of open access mega-journals. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 24(2), 115-31. https://doi.org/10.22452/mjlis.vol24no2.7

Fein, C. (2013). Multidimensional journal evaluation of PLOS ONE. Libri, 63(4), 259-71. https://doi.org/10.1515/libri-2013-0021

Huamani, C., De Castro, J. R., González-Alcaide, G., Polesel, D. N., Tufik, S. & Andersen, M. L. (2015). Scientific research in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: Bibliometric analysis in scopus, 1991–2012. Sleep Breath, 19(1), 109-114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-014-0969-x

Leydesdorff, L. (2004). The evaluation of research and the scientometric research program: historical evolution and redefinitions of the relationship. Studies in Science of Science, 22(3), 225-232.

Leydesdorff, L. & Wagner, C. S. (2008). International collaboration in science and the formation of a core group. Journal of Informetrics. 2(4), 317-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2008.07.003

McGillivray, B. & Astell, M. (2019). The relationship between usage and citations in an open access mega-journal. Scientometrics, 121(2), 817-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03228-3

Nugent, K., Edriss, H., Ball, S. & Björk, B. C. (2019). Megajournals, scientifically sound peer review and medical organizations. The American Journal of the Medical Sciences, 357(1), 3-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjms.2018.09.003

Shopovski, J. & Marolov, D. (2017). Why academics choose to publish in a mega-journal. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(4), 348-353. http://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v6n4p348

Solomon, D. J. (2014). A survey of authors publishing in four megajournals. PeerJ, 2, e365. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.365

Spezi, V., Wakeling, S., Pinfield, S., Creaser, C., Fry, J. & Willett, P. (2017). Open-access mega-journals: The future of scholarly communication or academic dumping ground? A review. Journal of Documentation, 73(2), 263-283. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-06-2016-0082

Syahid, A. (2020). Open Access Journals in the member states of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations. International Journal of Information Science and Management (IJISM), 18(2), 33-49. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.20088302.2020.18.2.3.4

Wakeling, S., Creaser, C., Pinfield, S., Fry, J., Spezi, V., Willett, P., Paramita, M. (2019). Motivations, understandings, and experiences of open‐access mega‐journal authors: Results of a large‐scale survey. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 70(7), 754-68. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24154

Wakeling, S., Willett, P., Creaser, C., Fry, J., Pinfield, S. & Spezi, V. (2016). Open-access mega-journals: A bibliometric profile. PLoS One, 11(11), e0165359. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165359