International Journal of Information Science and Management (IJISM)

Research Misconduct Policies on Iranian and Non-Iranian University Portals

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Azimeh Takrimi 1
Reza Khojasteh Mehr 2

1 Department of Languages and Literature, Farhangian University, Ahvaz, Iran

2 Department of Counseling, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22034/ijism.2025.2055337.1763
Abstract
 Research misconduct is increasing worldwide in both type and prevalence, creating significant issues for universities and research institutions and threatening the trustworthiness of research findings. To curb such malpractices, countries have adopted various policies tailored to their educational, social, and institutional contexts. The present study examines the research misconduct policies of Iran and non-Iranian countries, as reflected on the websites of prominent universities in these countries. The research question was whether policies for addressing research misconduct are available on these university portals and what similarities and differences exist among these policies. The research was conducted in two phases: one in English and the other in Persian. During this period, the portals of 24 selected universities, both within and outside Iran, were reviewed. Content analysis of the textual data revealed that the definitions and types of research misconduct reflected on the portals of Iranian universities closely followed national policies and were highly consistent with those of universities abroad, all extending beyond fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism. The findings also showed that the predominant approach in the policies announced by Iranian universities was punitive. Moreover, there were significant differences compared to the policies on the websites of non-Iranian universities, including attention to training and prevention; procedures for investigating and responding to allegations of research misconduct; promoting transparency through plagiarism tariffs, as well as the presence of research misconduct-cognizant committees and/or experts at departmental and/or faculty level. Recommendations were made for adopting educational and preventive approaches to research misconduct and promoting ethical research behaviors in universities and research organizations.
 
 

Keywords

Research Misconduct
Policies
Academic Integrity
Iranian Universities
Ethics

Subjects

Anderson, M. S., Horn, A. S., Risbey, K. R., Ronning, E. A., De Vries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2007). What do mentoring and training in the responsible conduct of research have to do with scientists' misbehavior? Findings from a National Survey of NIH-funded scientists. Academic medicine: journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 82(9), 853–860. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f764c
Ashtarian, K. (2015). UNESCO Science Report: towards 2030. United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organizations. Paris: Unesco Publishing. Retrieved from https://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/unesco-science-report-towards-2030-part1.pdf
Bouter, L. M., Tijdink, J., Axelsen, N., Martinson, B. & Riet, G. (2016). Ranking major and minor research misbehaviors: results from a survey among participants of four World Conferences on Research Integrity. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 1, 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-016-0024-5
 
Bretag, T., Mahmud, S., East, J., Green, M., James, C., McGowan, U., Partridge, L., Walker, R. & Wallace, M. (June 2011). Academic Integrity standards: A preliminary analysis of the academic integrity policies at Australian universities. Proceedings of AuQF 2011: Demonstrating Quality (pp. 48-53). Melbourne, Australia: AuQF. http://ro.uow.edu.au/asdpapers/323. Retrieved from https://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1332&context=asdpapers
Choopani, H., Siadat, S. & Rajaii Pour, S. (2020). Organizational factors related to research misconduct with emphasis on professional ethics in research. Journal of Ethics in Science and Technology, 15(1), 71-178. Retrieved from file:///C:/Users/Reza/Downloads/ethicsjour-v15n1p71-en.pdf [in Persian]
Elo, S. & Kyngas, H. (2007). The Qualitative content analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing Research Methodology, 62(1), 107-115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
Fanelli, D. (2009). How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. PLoS One, 4(5), e5738. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005738
Fang, F. C., Steen, R. G. & Casadevall, A. (2012). Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(42), 17028–17033. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212247109
Foltýnek, T. & Glendinning, I. (2015). Impact of policies for plagiarism in higher education across Europe: Results of the project. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 63(1), 207-216. https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201563010207
Kalichman, M. W. & Plemmons, D. K. (2007). Reported goals for responsible conduct of research courses. Academic Medicine, 82(9), 846-852. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0b013e31812f78bf
Li, D. & Cornelis, G. (2020). Defining and handling research misconduct: A comparison between Chinese and European institutional policies. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15(4), 302-319. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264620927628
Macfarlane, B., Zhang, J. & Puna, A. (2014). Academic integrity: A review of the Literature. Studies in Higher Education, 39(2), 339-358. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2012.709495
Mahdavi Zafarghandi, A., Khoshroo, F. & Barkat, B. (2012). An investigation of Iranian EFL masters' perceptions of plagiarism. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 8(2), 69-85. Retrieved from file:///C:/Users/Reza/Downloads/ojsadmin,+Zafarghandi+et+al+An+Investigation+of+Iranian+EFL+Masters+students+13+Dec+2012.pdf
Martinson, B. C., Anderson, M. S. & de Vries, R. (2005). Scientists behaving badly. Nature, 435(7043), 737–738. https://doi.org/10.1038/435737a
Nushi, M. & Firoozkohi, A. (2017). Plagiarism Policies in Iranian University TEFL Teachers' Syllabuses: An Exploratory Study. 13,12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-017-0023-4
Office of Science and Technology Policy (2000). Federal Research Misconduct Policy. Retrieved from https://ori.hhs.gov/federal-research-misconduct-policy
 
 
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development Global Science Forum (2018). Best Practices for Ensuring Scientific Integrity and Preventing Misconduct. Retrieved from https://www.cnr.it/sites/default/files/public/media/doc_istituzionali/ethics/OECD_BestPracticesResearchIntegrity.pdf
Resnik, D. B. (2023). Research Misconduct and Questionable Research Practices. In Handbook of Bioethical Decisions. Volume II: Scientific Integrity and Institutional Ethics (pp. 25-36). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Resnik, D. B. & Dinse, G. E. (2013). Scientific retractions and corrections related to misconduct findings. Journal of Medical Ethics, 39(1), 46–50. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2012-100766
Resnik, D. B. & Master, Z. (2013). Policies and initiatives aimed at addressing research misconduct in high-income countries. PLoS Medicine, 10(3), e1001406. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001406
Resnik, D. B., Rasmussen, L. M., & Kissling, G. E. (2015). An international study of research misconduct policies. Accountability in research, 22(5), 249–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2014.958218
Shamoo, A. E. & Resnik, D. (2015). Responsible conduct of research. (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Smith, E. & Williams-Jones, B. (2012). Authorship and responsibility in health sciences research: A review of procedures for fairly allocating authorship in multi-author studies. Science and Engineering Ethics, 18, 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9263-5
Steneck, N. H. (1994). Research universities and scientific misconduct: History, policies, and the future. The Journal of Higher Education, 65(3), 310-330.
Steneck, N. H. (2006). Fostering integrity in research: Definitions, current knowledge, and future directions. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/pl00022268
Takrimi, A., Khojasteh Mehr, R. & Eaton, S. E. (2022). Contract cheating in Iran: An overview of key issues and a call to action. Journal of Academic Ethics, 21(2), 323-341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-022-09458-0
Tennant, G., Rowell, P. & Duggan, F. (2007). Academic Misconduct Benchmarking Research Project (Part I): The Range and Spread of Penalties Available for Student Plagiarism among UK Higher Education Institutions. Retrieved from https://eprints.ncl.ac.uk/304
University of Hong Kong. (2017). Principles of research integrity: The University of Hong Kong’s policy on research integrity. Retrieved from https://researchintegrity.law.hku.hk/hku-policy-on-research-integrity/
Weber-Wulff, D. (2014). False Feathers: A Perspective on Academic Plagiarism. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39961-9
International Journal of Information Science and Management (IJISM)
Volume 23, Issue 4
Autumn 2025
Pages 1-22

  • Receive Date 08 March 2025
  • Revise Date 18 August 2025
  • Accept Date 18 August 2025

Home

Guide for Authors

Submit Manuscript

Reviewers

Contact Us

Copyright Ownership