International Journal of Information Science and Management (IJISM)

Analysis of Retracted Open Access Publications by Indian Authors: Insights from Scopus Database

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Ishfaq Ahmad Palla 1
Mangkhollen Singson 2

1 ICSSR Post-Doctoral Fellow, Department of Library and Information Science, Pondicherry University, India

2 Associate Prof., Department of Library and Information Science, Pondicherry University, India

https://doi.org/10.22034/ijism.2025.2043967.1626
Abstract
 Retracting scientific papers helps maintain the integrity of scientific literature by preventing flawed research from being considered credible in the future. This study seeks to understand better the factors leading to the retraction of open-access academic articles by Indian researchers. The Scopus database was searched between 2010 and 2023 to extract the open-access retractions. The Retraction Watch database was consulted to determine the reason for the retractions. The present study categorized retraction causes into eight distinct categories. The findings indicate that the year 2022 had the highest number of retractions (N=778, 66.04%). The most prevalent grounds for retraction were peer review manipulation (64%, N = 754), duplication (12.81%, N = 151), and plagiarism (8.99%, N = 106). The findings reveal that retracted papers with 2–6 authors were more likely to be withdrawn owing to peer review manipulation, duplication, and plagiarism. The retraction process for data duplication, falsification/and fabrication took approximately four years.  Retracted articles were published in 317 unique journals; 237 had impact factors ranging from 0.1 to 96.2. Nineteen journals retracted a total of 795 (67.48%) papers. Most open-access retractions were issued to co-authored papers (N=1129, 95.84%). Nine publishers issued (N=1111, 94.31%) total retractions. Springer Nature issued the highest number of retractions (N=718, 60.95%), followed by IOP Publishing Ltd. (N=238, 20.20%) and Wiley issued (N=72, 6.11%) retraction notices.
 
 

Keywords

Misconduct
Retractions
Plagiarism
Fake Peer Review
Open Access

Subjects

Al-Ghareeb, A., Hillel, S., McKenna, L., Cleary, M., Visentin, D., Jones, M., & Gray, R. (2018). Retraction of publications in nursing and midwifery research: A systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 81, 8-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.01.013
Amos, K. A. (2014). The ethics of scholarly publishing: Exploring differences in plagiarism and duplicate publication across nations. Journal of Medical Library Association, 102 (2),87-91. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.102.2.005
Anderson, M.S., Kot, F. C., Shaw, M. A., Lepkowski, C. C. & De Vries, R. G. (2011). Authorship diplomacy: Cross-national differences complicate allocation of credit and responsibility. American Scientist, 99(3), 204–207. https://doi.org/10.1511/2011.90.204
Aspura, M. Y. K. I., Noorhidawati, A. & Abrizah, A. (2018). An analysis of Malaysian retracted papers: Misconduct or mistakes? Scientometrics, 115(3),1315-1328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2720-z
Bakker, T. C. M. & Traniello, J. F. A. (2019). Peer-review reciprocity and commitment to manuscript evaluation. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 73(38). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-019-2647-2
Bakker, C. J., Reardon, E. E., Brown, S. J., Theis-Mahon, N., Schroter, S., Bouter, L., & Zeegers, M. P. (2024). Identification of retracted publications and completeness of retraction notices in public health. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 173, 111427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111427
 
 
Barreiro, E. (2013). Open access: Is the scientific quality of biomedical publications threatened? Archivos de Bronconeumología, 49(12), 505–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arbr.2013.10.003
Basumatary, B. & Verma, M. K. (2024). Unearthing the misconduct and inaccuracies in social science research: a trend analysis of retracted articles based on Retraction Watch database. Global Knowledge, Memory, and Communication. Ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-04-2024-0228
Baždarić, K., Bilić-Zulle, L., Brumini, G. & Petrovečki, M. (2012). Prevalence of plagiarism in recent submissions to the Croatian Medical Journal. Science and Engineering Ethics, 18(2), 223-239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9347-2
Bilbrey, E., O’Dell, N. & Creamer, J. (2014). A novel rubric for rating the quality of retraction notices. Publications, 2(1), 14-26. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications2010014
Budd, J. M., Sievert, M., & Schultz, T. R. (1998). Phenomena of retraction: Reasons for retraction and citations to the publications. Journal of the American Medical Association, 280(3), 296–297. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.280.3.296
Campos-Varela, I. & Ruano-Raviña, A. (2019). Misconduct is the main cause for retraction. A descriptive study of retracted publications and their authors. Gaceta Sanitaria, 33(4), 356-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.01.009
Campos-Varela, I., Villaverde-Castañeda, R. & Ruano-Raviña, A. (2020). Retraction of publications: A study of biomedical journals retracting publications based on impact factor and journal category. Gaceta Sanitaria, 34(5), 430–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2019.05.008
Candal-Pedreira, C., Ross, J. S., Ruano-Ravina, A., Egilman, D. S., Fernández, E. & Pérez-Ríos, M. (2022). Retracted papers originating from paper mills: cross-sectional study. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 379, e071517. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2022-071517
Chambers, L. M., Michener, C. M., & Falcone, T. (2019). Plagiarism and data falsification are the most common reasons for retracted publications in obstetrics and gynaecology. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 126(9), 1134-1140. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15689
Corbyn, Z. (2012). Misconduct is the main cause of life sciences retractions. Nature, 490(7418), 21. https://doi.org/10.1038/490021a
Damineni, R. S., Sardiwal, K. K., Waghle, S. R. & Dakshyani, M. B. (2015). A comprehensive comparative analysis of articles retracted in 2012 and 2013 from the scholarly literature. Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry, 5(1), 19–23. https://doi.org/10.4103/2231-0762.151968
Demeter, M., Jele, A. & Major, Z. B. (2021). The international development of open access publishing: A comparative empirical analysis over seven world regions and nine academic disciplines. Publishing Research Quarterly, 37(3), 364-383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-021-09814-9
Dua, J., Singh, V. K. & Lathabai, H. H. (2023). Measuring and characterizing international collaboration patterns in Indian scientific research. Scientometrics, 128(9), 5081-5116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04794-3
Elango, B., Kozak, M. & Rajendran, P. (2019). Analysis of retractions in Indian science. Scientometrics, 119(2), 1081–1094. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03079-y
 
Fang, F. C. & Casadevall, A. (2011). Retracted science and the retraction index. Infection and Immunity, 79(10), 3855-59. https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.05661-11
Fang, F. C., Steen, R. G. & Casadevall, A. (2012). Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109 (42), 17028-17033. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212247109
Foo, J. Y. A. (2011). A retrospective analysis of the trend of retracted publications in the field of biomedical and life sciences. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17(3),459-468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-010-9212-8
Gazni, A., Sugimoto, C. R. & Didegah, F. (2012). Mapping world scientific collaboration: Authors, institutions, and countries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(2), 323-335. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21688
Gilbert, N. (2009).  The editor will quit over the hoax paper. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/news.2009.571
Grieneisen, M. L. & Zhang, M. (2012). A comprehensive survey of retracted articles from the scholarly literature. PloS One, 7(10), e44118. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044118 
Grubbs, J. C., Glass, R. I., & Kilmarx, P. H. (2019). Coauthor country affiliations in international collaborative research funded by the US National Institutes of Health, 2009 to 2017. JAMA Network Open, 2(11), e1915989-e1915989. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23266
He, T. (2013). Retraction of global scientific publications from 2001 to 2010. Scientometrics, 96(2), 555-561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0906-3
Heller, M., Moshiri, M. & Bhargava, P. (2013). From the editor's desk: Benefits of open-access publishing. Radiology Case Reports, 8(2), 840. https://doi.org/10.2484/rcr.v8i2.840
Huh, S, Kim, S.Y., & Cho, H. M. (2016). Characteristics of retractions from Korean medical journals in the KoreaMed Database: A bibliometric analysis. PLoS ONE   11(10), e0163588. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163588
Jeong, S., Choi, J. Y. & Kim, J. Y. (2014). On the drivers of international collaboration: The impact of informal communication, motivation, and research resources. Science and Public Policy, 41(4), 520-531. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/sct079
Kamali, N., Abadi, A. T. B. & Rahimi, F. (2020). Plagiarism, fake peer-review, and duplication: predominant reasons underlying retractions of Iran-affiliated scientific papers, Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(6), 3455–3463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00274-6
Khademizadeh, S., Danesh, F., Esmaeili, S., Lund, B. & Santos-d’Amorim, K. (2023). Evolution of retracted publications in the medical sciences: Citations analysis, bibliometrics, and altmetrics trends. Accountability in Research, 31(8), 1182–1197. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2023.2223996
Khurana, P., Sharma, K. & Uddin, Z. (2024). Unraveling retraction dynamics in COVID-19 research: Patterns, reasons, and implications. Accountability in Research, 32(7), 1241-1264.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2024.2379906
King, E. G., Oransky, I., Sachs, T. E., Farber, A., Flynn, D. B., Abritis, A., Kalish, J. A., & Siracuse, J. J. (2018). Analysis of retracted articles in the surgical literature. American journal of surgery, 216(5), 851–855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.11.033
Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., Sugimoto, C. R. & Tsou, A. (2015). Team size matters: Collaboration and scientific impact since 1900. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(7), 1323-1332. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23266
Lee, S. & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35(5),673–702.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312705052359
Lei, L. & Zhang, Y. (2018). Lack of improvement in scientific integrity: an analysis of WoS retractions by Chinese researchers (1997–2016). Science and Engineering Ethics, 24(5),1409-1420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9962-7
Liu, W. & Li, Y. (2018). Open access publications in sciences and social sciences: A comparative analysis. Learned Publishing, 31(2), 107-119. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1114
Liu, X. & Chen, X. (2018). Journal retractions: Some unique features of research misconduct in China. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 49(3), 305-319. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.49.3.02
Mena, J. D., Ndoye, M., Cohen, A. J., Kamal, P., & Breyer, B. N. (2019). The landscape of urological retractions: the prevalence of reported research misconduct. BJU International, 124(1),174-179. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14706
Misra, D. P., Ravindran, V. & Agarwal, V. (2018). Integrity of authorship and peer review practices: Challenges and opportunities for improvement. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 33(46), e287. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e287
Misra, D. P., Ravindran, V., Wakhlu, A., Sharma, A., Agarwal, V. & Negi, V. S. (2017). Plagiarism: A Viewpoint from India. Journal of Korean medical science, 32(11), 1734-1735. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2017.32.11.1734
Moylan, E. C. & Kowalczuk, M. K. (2016). Why articles are retracted: a retrospective cross-sectional study of retraction notices at BioMed Central. BMJ Open, 6(11), e012047. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012047   
Nath, S. B., Marcus, S. C. & Druss, B. G. (2006). Retractions in the research literature: misconduct or mistakes?  Medical Journal of Australia, 185(3), 152-154. https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00504.x
Nature (2014). Why high-profile journals have more retractions. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature.2014.15951
Noorden, R.V. (2011). Science publishing: The trouble with retractions. Nature, 478, 26-28. https://doi.org/10.1038/478026a
O'Kelly, F., Fernandez, N. & Koyle, M. A. (2019). Predatory publishing or a lack of peer review transparency? A contemporary analysis of indexed open and non-open access articles in paediatric urology. Journal of Pediatric Urology, 15(2), 159-e1-159.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.08.019
Ortega, J. L. (2021). The relationship and incidence of three editorial notices in PubPeer: Errata, expressions of concern, and retractions. Learned Publishing, 34(2), 164-174. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1339
Palla, I. A., Singson, M. & Thiyagarajan, S. (2020). A comparative analysis of retracted papers in Health Sciences from China and India. Accountability in Research, 27(7), 401-416. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2020.1754804
Palla, I. A., Singson, M., & Thiyagarajan, S. (2023). Systematic examination of post‐and pre‐citation of Indian‐authored retracted papers. Learned Publishing, 36(4), 638-650. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1572
Peterson, G. M. (2013). Characteristics of retracted open access biomedical literature: A bibliographic analysis, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(12), 2428-2436. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22944
Redman, B. K., Yarandi, H. N., & Merz, J. F. (2008). Empirical developments in retraction. Journal of Medical Ethics, 34(11), 807–809. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2007.023069
Resnik, D. B. & Dinse, G. E. (2013). Scientific retractions and corrections related to misconduct findings. Journal of Medical Ethics, 39(1), 46-50. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2012-100766
Rosenkrantz, A. B., Parikh, U., & Duszak Jr, R. (2018). Citation impact of collaboration in radiology research. Journal of the American College of Radiology, 15(2), 258-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2017.09.030
Retraction Watch (2014).  After 16 retractions, the management Professor Lichtenthaler resigned from the post. Retrieved from  https://retractionwatch.com/2014/10/10/after-16-retractions-management-professor-lichtenthaler-resigns-post/
Scarazzati, S. & Wang, L. (2019). The effect of collaborations on scientific research output: the case of nanoscience in Chinese regions. Scientometrics, 121(2), 839-868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03220-x
Shah, T. A., Gul, S., Bashir, S., Ahmad, S., Huertas, A., Oliveira, A., Gulzar, F., Najar, A. H. & Chakraborty, K. (2021). Influence of accessibility (open and toll-based) of scholarly publications on retractions. Scientometrics, 126(6), 4589-4606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03990-3
Sharma, K. (2021). Team size and retracted citations reveal the patterns of retractions from 1981 to 2020. Scientometrics, 126(10), 8363-8374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04125-4
Sharma, K. & Mukherjee, S. (2024). The ripple effect of retraction on an author’s collaboration network. Journal of Computational Social Science, 2, 1519-1531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-024-00278-3
Shepperd, M. & Yousefi, L. (2023). An analysis of retracted papers in computer science. Plos One, 18(5), e0285383. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285383
Shimray, S. R. (2023). Research done wrong: A comprehensive investigation of retracted publications in COVID-19. Accountability in Research, 30(7), 393-406. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2021.2014327
Singson, M., Joy, M. G., Thiyagarajan, S. & Dkhar, V. (2015). Perceptions of open access publishing by Faculty at Pondicherry University: A survey. International Information & Library Review, 47(1-2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2015.1021625
Steen, R. G. (2010). Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud? Journal of Medical Ethics, 37(2), 113-117. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2010.038125
Stretton, S., Bramich, N. J., Keys, J. R., Monk, J. A., Ely, J. A., Haley, C., Woolley, M. J., & Woolley, K. L. (2012). Publication misconduct and plagiarism retractions: A systematic, retrospective study. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 28(10), 1575–1583. https://doi.org/10.1185/03007995.2012.728131
Tang, L., Hu, G., Sui, Y., Yang, Y. & Cao, C. (2020). Retraction: the “other face” of research collaboration? Science and Engineering Ethics, 26, 1681-1708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00209-1
Trikalinos, N. A., Evangelou, E., & Ioannidis, J. P. (2008). Falsified papers in high-impact journals were slow to retract and indistinguishable from nonfraudulent papers. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61(5), 464-470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.019
Wager, E. & Williams, P. (2011). Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988–2008. Journal of Medical Ethics, 37(9), 567-570. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2010.040964
Wang, T., Xing, Q. R., Wang, H., & Chen, W. (2019). Retracted publications in the biomedical literature from open-access journals. Science and Engineering Ethics, 25(3), 855–868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-018-0040-6
Williams, P. & Wager, E (2013). Exploring why and how journal editors retract articles: Findings from a qualitative study. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(1),1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9292-0  
Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F. & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in the production of knowledge is evident. Science, 316(5827), 1036–1039.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099
Yan, J., MacDonald, A., Baisi, L. P., Evaniew, N., Bhandari, M. & Ghert, M. (2016), Retractions in orthopaedic research: a systematic review. Bone & Joint Research, 5(6), 263-268. https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.56.bjr-2016-0047
Zhang, C. J. & Zhu, Y. (2016). China’s graduate students need better education in scientific writing and publishing, Journal of Zhejiang University Science B, 17(5), 409-412. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B1600174
Zhang, Y. (2010). Chinese journal finds 31% of submissions plagiarized. Nature, 467(7312), 153. https://doi.org/10.1038/467153d
Zheng, E. T. & Fu, H. Z. (2024).  A comparative study on characteristics of retracted publications across different open access levels. Journal of Data and Information Science, 9(2), 22-40. https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2024-0010
Zhou, P. & Glänzel, W. (2010). In-depth analysis of China’s international cooperation in science. Scientometrics, 82(3), 597-612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0174-z
 
 
International Journal of Information Science and Management (IJISM)
Volume 23, Issue 4
Autumn 2025
Pages 209-229

  • Receive Date 22 October 2024
  • Accept Date 13 October 2025

Home

Guide for Authors

Submit Manuscript

Reviewers

Contact Us

Copyright Ownership