The Quality of Methodological Reporting of Cross-Sectional Articles Published in Iranian and Top Nursing and Midwifery Journals Indexed in the Scopus Database

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Midwifery Faculty of Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran.

2 MSc, School of Paramedical Science, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran.

3 Assistant Prof., School of Paramedical Science, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran.

Abstract
 Insufficient reporting of cross-sectional articles in scientific journals reduces the validity of the articles or makes them impossible to evaluate. It also reduces the number of citations of articles. This research aims to investigate the adherence of methodological section reports in Iranian nursing and midwifery journals (IRNMJ) to those in top international nursing and midwifery journals (INNMJ) indexed in the Scopus database and to compare the growth trend of methodological section reports in these two groups. A descriptive-analytical cross-sectional study was used. Using the STROBE statement in the methodology section, a 19-item instrument was prepared to collect information. 8 Iranian journals with 462 articles and 3 top Scopus journals with 327 articles were evaluated. The quality score of the methodological report of each article was calculated and analyzed using SPSS 19 software. The results of the study showed that the percentage of agreement with the STROBE statement was 75% in the IRNMJ and 85% in the INNMJ. In both groups of journals, some methodological reporting items, such as efforts to address potential sources of bias, had a low percentage of reporting, which has increased over time. From a scientific point of view, increasing the use of reporting guidelines can help to check the validity of the research and also increase the number of citations to the articles. Therefore, it is recommended that editors and reviewers of scientific journals in the field of nursing and midwifery place more emphasis on following reporting guidelines.
 
 

Keywords

Subjects


Adams, A. D., Benner, R. S., Riggs, T. W., & Chescheir, N. C. (2018). Use of the STROBE checklist to evaluate the reporting quality of observational research in obstetrics. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 132(2), 507–512. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000002689
Agha, R. A., Lee, S.-Y., Jeong, K. J. L., Fowler, A. J. & Orgill, D. P. (2016). Reporting quality of observational studies in plastic surgery needs improvement: A systematic review. Annals of Plastic Surgery, 76(5), 585–589. https://doi.org/10.1097/sap.0000000000000419
Aghazadeh-Attari, J., Mobaraki, K., Ahmadzadeh, J., Mansorian, B., & Mohebbi, I. (2018). Quality of observational studies in prestigious journals of occupational medicine and health based on Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: A cross-sectional study. BMC Research Notes, 11(1), 266. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3367-9
Alkhaqani, A. L. (2022). Application of strengthening the reporting of observational studies (STROBE) statement guideline in nursing studies: Analytical review. Al-Rafidain Journal of Medical Sciences, 2, 93–100. https://doi.org/10.54133/ajms.v2i.66
Bravo-Peña, M., Barona-Fong, L., Campo-López, J., Arroyave, Y. & Calvache, J. A. (2017). Assessing the completeness of reporting of observational studies in the Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology. Cross-sectional study. Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology, 45(1), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcae.2016.11.017
Capili, B. (2021). Overview: Cross-sectional studies. The American Journal of Nursing, 121(10), 59-62. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000794280.73744.fe
Caulley, L., Cheng, W., Catalá-López, F., Whelan, J., Khoury, M., Ferraro, J., Husereau, D., Altman, D. G. & Moher, D. (2020). Citation impact was highly variable for reporting guidelines of health research: A citation analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 127, 96–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.07.013
Choe, M.-A., Kim, N. C., Kim, K. M., Kim, S. J., Park, K. S., Byeon, Y. S., Shin, S. R., Yang, S., Lee, K. S., & Lee, E. H. (2014). Trends in nursing research in Korea: Research trends for studies published from the inaugural issue to 2010 in the Journal of the Korean Academy of Nursing and the journals published by member societies underthe  Korean Academy of Nursing Science. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 44(5), 484–494. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2014.44.5.484
Cinelli, C. & Hazlett, C. (2020). Making sense of sensitivity: Extending omitted variable bias. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 82(1), 39–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/rssb.12348
Ghaferi, A. A., Schwartz, T. A. & Pawlik, T. M. (2021). STROBE reporting guidelines for observational studies. JAMA Surgery, 156(6), 577–578. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2021.0528
Hopkins, Z., Diaz, O., Kaprive, J. F., Carlisle, R., Moreno, C., Bommareddy, K., Sheik, N., Frost, Z., Akhtar, A., & Secrest, A. M. (2023). Methods reporting quality and its association with methods section length: A cross-sectional assessment of STROBE and CONSORT reporting adherence in top-cited dermatology journals. The Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology, 16(7), 54–62.
 
Irani, M., Bashtian, M. H., Khadivzadeh, T., Ebrahimipour, H., & Nekah, S. M. A. (2018). Weaknesses in the reporting of cross-sectional studies in accordance with the STROBE report (the case of congenital anomaly among infants in Iran): A review article. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 47(12), 17961804. Retrieved from https://ijph.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ijph/article/view/15504/6219
Jeelani, A., Malik, W., Haq, I., Aleem, S., Mujtaba, M. & Syed, N. (2014). Cross-sectional studies published in the Indian Journal of Community Medicine: evaluation of adherence to Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology statement. Annals of Medical and Health Sciences Research, 4(6), 875–878. https://doi.org/10.4103/2141-9248.144889
Kim, S., Oh, H.-E., Song, J.-E., Kim, M., Ahn, S., Lee, E.-J., Jun, E.-M., & Cheon, S. (2014). Analysis of reports on observational studies published in the Korean Journal of Women's Health Nursing based on the STROBE guideline. Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing, 20(4), 287–296. https://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2014.20.4.287
Moher, D. & Altman, D. G. (2015). Four proposals to help improve the medical research literature. PLOS Medicine, 12(9), e1001864. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001864
Nagarajan, V. B., Bhide, S., Kanase, H. R., Potey, A. V. & Tadavi, F. (2018). Adherence of observational studies published in Indian Journals to the STRO BE statement. The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India, 66(12), 39–42.
Rahmani, M. R., Ayoobi, F., Assar, S., Jalalpour, S. & Rezaeian, M. (2017). Presentation of the guideline of strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology. Journal of Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, 16(3), 257-274. https://dor.org/20.1001.1.17353165.1396.16.3.1.7 [in Persian]
Rahmani, N., Salehi, A., Molavi Vardanjani, H., Marzban, M. & Behbood, A. (2020). Using STROBE checklist to assess the reporting quality of observational studies affiliated with Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, and its correlates: A scientometric study from Iran. Scientometrics, 122(2), 989–1001. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03317-3
Shaghaghian, S. & Astaneh, B. (2020). Adherence to the strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology statement in observational studies published in Iranian Medical Journals. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 49(8), 1520–1529. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v49i8.3896
Sharp, M. K., Bertizzolo, L., Rius, R., Wager, E., Gómez, G., & Hren, D. (2019). Using the STROBE statement: Survey findings emphasized the role of journals in enforcing reporting guidelines. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 116, 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.07.019
Sorensen, A. A., Wojahn, R. D., Manske, M. C., & Calfee, R. P. (2013). Using the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement to assess reporting of observational trials in hand surgery. The Journal of Hand Surgery, 38(8), 1584–1589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.05.008
Tapia, J. C., Ruiz, E. F., Ponce, O. J., Malaga, G. & Miranda, J. (2015). Weaknesses in the reporting of cross-sectional studies according to the STROBE statement: The case of metabolic syndrome in adults from Peru. Colombia Médica (Cali, Colombia), 46(4), 168–175.
 
Vilaró, M., Cortés, J., Selva-O’Callaghan, A., Urrutia, A., Ribera, J.-M., Cardellach, F., Basagaña, X., Elmore, M., Vilardell, M. & Altman, D. (2019). Adherence to reporting guidelines increases the number of citations: the argument for including a methodologist in the editorial process and peer review. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19, 112. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0746-4
von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., Vandenbroucke, J. P. & STROBE Initiative (2007). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet (London, England), 370(9596), 1453–1457. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X
Wang, X. & Cheng, Z. (2020). Cross-sectional studies: Strengths, weaknesses, and recommendations. Chest, 158(1S), S65–S71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.012
Wiehn, E., Ricci, C., Álvarez‐Perea, A., Perkin, M. R., Jones, C. J., Akdis, C., Bousquet, J., Eigenmann, P., Grattan, C. & Apfelbacher, C. J. (2021). Adherence to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist in articles published in EAACI Journals: A bibliographic study. Allergy, 76(12), 3581–3588. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.14951
Zhang, J., Zhou, X., Li, B., Zhou, J. & Chen, Y. (2021). The reporting quality of observational studies relevant to the STROBE-nut statement in journals of nutrition. Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 30(1), 174–183. https://doi.org/10.6133/apjcn.202103_30(1).0020
Volume 23, Issue 4
Autumn 2025
Pages 249-264

  • Receive Date 09 December 2024
  • Accept Date 18 October 2025