A Framework for Developing Research Data Governance in Higher Education Institutes: The Case of the University of Qom

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 MSc in Knowledge and Information Science, Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Faculty of Literature and Human Sciences, University of Qom, Iran.

2 Professor, Knowledge and Information Science, Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Faculty of Literature and Human Sciences, University of Qom, Iran.

3 Assistant Prof., Department of Computer Engineering. Faculty of Engineering, University of Qom, Iran.

4 Assistant Prof., Knowledge and Information Science, Society and Information Research Department, Iranian Research Institute for Information Science and Technology (IranDoc), Iran.

10.22034/ijism.2026.2024173.1419
Abstract
Research data are vital assets, and higher education institutes (HEIs) are advised to establish spaces for sharing such data. Consequently, the governance of research data has become a significant concern for HEIs. However, the coverage and content of research data governance (RDG) remain unclear. This study aims to identify dimensions and components of an RDG and propose a comprehensive framework in this regard. To identify key dimensions of the RDG, 20 documents on data management and RDG from HEIs worldwide were selected. These documents were coded using MAXQDA software. Subsequently, in-depth interviews were conducted with seven experts in the field. The interviews were transcribed and coded in MAXQDA. The results of document analysis and expert opinions were combined to identify dimensions and components of a comprehensive framework for RDG within HEIs. The research indicates that a comprehensive framework for RDG should address the organizational, legal, and technical aspects of research data management. The framework for RDG comprises five main sections: introduction, approval, principles and policies, roles and responsibilities, and data management. Research data constitute valuable institutional assets that require proper governance. The framework for RDG aims to effectively and efficiently manage these data through policy formulation and delineation of roles and responsibilities within HEIs. To harness the potential benefits of these assets, an RDG policy is essential for HEIs. This is the first study to identify the dimensions and key components of a framework for RDG. While extensive research has been conducted on data management/governance, a structured policy in this domain is neglected. This study attempts to bridge this gap.
 
 

Keywords

Subjects


Abraham, R., Schneider, J., & vom Brocke, J. (2019). Data governance: A conceptual framework, structured review, and research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 49, 424–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.07.008
Al-Ruithe, M., Benkhelifa, E., & Hameed, K. (2019). A systematic literature review of data governance and cloud data governance. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 23(5-6), 839–859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-017-1104-3
Ashiq, M., Usmani, M. H., & Naeem, M. (2020). A systematic literature review on research data management practices and services. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 71(8/9), 649–671. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-07-2020-0103
Bernardo, B. M. V., Mamede, H. S., Barroso, J. M. P., & dos Santos, V. M. P. D. (2024). Data governance & quality management—Innovation and breakthroughs across different Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 9(4), 100598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2024.100598
Bhansali, N. (2013). Data governance: Creating value from information assets. Auerbach Publications.
BIMMInstitute (2021). Research data governance policy. Retrieved from https://www.bimm.ac.uk/research-data-governance-plan
Cheong, L., & Chang, V. (2007). The need for data governance: A case study. ACIS 2007 Proceedings - 18th Australasian Conference on Information Systems (pp. 999-1008). Australia. Retrieved from https://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1110&context=acis2007
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches in the UK. Sage Publications.
Cupoli, P., Earley, S., & Henderson, D. (2014). Dama-dmbok2 Framework. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/39943510/DAMA_DMBOK2_Framework
Dadiala, R., & Sinha, S. (2025). Data governance and modeling practices for intelligent water systems at a sewershed scale. Water Practice and Technology, 20(5), 1321–1337. https://doi.org/10.2166/wpt.2025.076
Davis, H. A., Kerkman, D., Hoberg, A. A., Countryman, M., Beaver, W., Bybee, K., Blum, J. M., & Knosp, B. M. (2025). Establishing data governance for sharing and access to real-world data: A case study. JAMIA Open, 8(3), ooaf041. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf041
Gibson, W., & Brown, A. (2009). Working with qualitative data. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857029041
Hassani, H., Huang, X., & MacFeely, S. (2025). Mapping the evolution of data governance scientific research. Data and Policy, 7, e51. https://doi.org/10.1017/dap.2025.10014
Javadi, M., Chung, M. S., Fard, N. G., & Miskat, M. (2023, December). A data governance literature review in education sector. In 2023 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI) (pp. 1662-1669). IEEE.
Koltay, T. (2020). Quality of open research data: Values, convergences and governance. Information, 11(4), 175. https://doi.org/10.3390/info11040175
Kouper, I., Raymond, A., & Giroux, S. (2020). An exploratory study of research data governance in the U.S. Open Information Science, 4(1), 122–142. https://doi.org/10.1515/opis-2020-0010
Majidi, A., Naghshineh, N., Ismaili Ghivi, M. R., & Hashemi, M. (2017). Study of the foundation, models, and issues of research data curation and management in scientific and academic environments. Human Information Interaction, 4(2), 31–57. Retrieved from http://hii.khu.ac.ir/article-1-2598-fa.html [in Persian]
 
 
 
Marlina, E., Hidayanto, A. N., & Purwandari, B. (2022). Towards a model of research data management readiness in the Indonesian context: An investigation of factors and indicators through the fuzzy Delphi method. Library & Information Science Research, 44(1), 101141. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2022.101141
Marlina, E., & Purwandari, B. (2019). Strategy for research data management services in Indonesia. Procedia Computer Science, 161, 788–796. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.184
Nai, S., Rifai, A., & Sadiq, A. (2025). Data governance, key insights, strategic challenges, and future imperatives. In Data Governance, DevSecOps, and Advancements in Modern Software (pp. 1–15). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-0365-9.ch001
Odebrecht, C. (2025). Research data governance. The need for a system of cross-organisational responsibility for the researcher’s data domain. Data Science Journal, 24, 12, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2025-012
Patel, D. (2016). Research data management: A conceptual framework. Library Review, 65(4-5), 226–241. https://doi.org/10.1108/LR-01-2016-0001
Solomonides, A. (2019). Research data governance, roles, and infrastructure. In Clinical research informatics (pp. 291-310). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98779-8_14
Sothilingam, R., Pant, V., Shahrin, N., & Eric, S. K. (2021). Towards a goal-oriented modeling approach for data governance. In PoEM (Forum) (pp. 69-77). Retrieved from https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3045/paper08.pdf
Stephens, J. J. (2018). Data governance importance and effectiveness:  Health system employee perception. Doctoral Dissertation. School of Health Sciences, Central Michigan University. USA. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/openview/a80278e979fd9c9cc0f99805241401ea/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750
Sweeney, K. J. (2018). Re-Imagining data governance. In Handbook of research on knowledge management for contemporary business environments (pp. 251–278). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-3725-0.ch014
Wende, K. (2007). A model for data governance–organising accountabilities for data quality management. ACIS 2007 proceedings. Paper presented at the 18th Australasian Conference on Information Systems (417-425). Australia. Retrieved from https://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/server/api/core/bitstreams/2fc24932-c72f-4405-9960-fda5bfd8d52e/content
Zhang, D., Song, B., Geng, H., Chen, Y., & Liu, H. (2025). The institutional evolution of chinese university data governance: An analytical framework based on historical institutionalism. Education Sciences, 15(7), 891. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15070891
Volume 24, Issue 1
Winter 2026
Pages 133-154

  • Receive Date 02 March 2024
  • Revise Date 26 August 2025
  • Accept Date 28 January 2026