Analysis of the Status of Articles Indexed in the Field of Infertility Treatment Published by Iranian Scholars: A Citation Analysis Approach versus Altmetrics Indicators

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D, Knowledge and Information Science, Department of Medical Library and Information Science, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran.

2 BSc, Medical Library and Information Science, Department of Medical Library and Information Science, Student Research and Technology Committee, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran.

3 Associate Prof., Knowledge and Information Science, Department of Medical Library and Information Science, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran.

10.22034/ijism.2026.2053371.1736
Abstract
The current study examines the status of scientific outputs on infertility treatment indexed in PubMed and evaluates these outputs on social media using altmetric indicators from 2015 to 2024. This research was conducted using a descriptive-analytical approach. To assess the status of scientific articles on infertility treatment using citation analysis, articles indexed in PubMed from 2015 to 2024 were collected, and their citation counts on Google Scholar were extracted. Subsequently, the effectiveness of these articles in social networks was considered using the altmetrics approach. In this section, the attention given to the papers was measured using the Altmetrics Bookmarklet. Finally, the data were analyzed using SPSS software. Of 1,204 articles retrieved from the PubMed database, 493 documents (42%) were mentioned in social media. During this period, attention to these articles has grown, with fluctuations, averaging 21.24 citations per article. Additionally, in the referenced articles by Iranian researchers, Mendeley accounted for the largest share with 482 articles (77.97%). Master's students had the highest share of referencing articles on Mendeley (38.10%). The United States accounted for 31.7% of the tweets related to articles by Iranian researchers, holding the largest share of retweets on platform X. The subject areas of medicine had the highest share of references on Mendeley at 18.3%. Furthermore, the correlation coefficient between the citation index and the Altmetric score was 0.27 and significant (P<0.05). Considering the positive role of social media in increasing the visibility and citation of scientific articles in the infertility treatment, showed that less than half of the articles by Iranian scholars in the infertility treatment have received attention on social media, it can be concluded that it is essential for researchers, academic institutions, and organizations supporting researchers to actively engage on various social media platforms to enhance the visibility of their publications and, consequently, increase the citation of these resources.

Keywords

Subjects


Akhondi, M. M., Kamali, K., Ranjbar, F., Shirzad, M., Shafeghati, S., Ardakani, Z. B., ... & Mohammad, K. (2013). Prevalence of primary infertility in Iran in 2010. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 42(12), 1398-1404. Retrieved from https://ijph.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ijph/article/view/4279/3931
Andersen, J. P. & Haustein, S. (2015). Influence of study type on twitter activity for medical research papers. Paper presented at Proceedings of the 15th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference (pp. 26-36). Istanbul, Turkey. Retrieved from https://www.issi-society.org/proceedings/issi_2015/0026.pdf
Araujo, A. C., Nascimento, D. P., Gonzalez, G. Z. & Costa, L. O. P. (2018). Editorial: How to increase the visibility of scientific articles through social media? Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, 22(6), 435-436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjpt.2018.08.009
Ariyanti, A. & Fitriana, R. (2020, February). EFL students' perception of Mendeley reference manager in thesis writing. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Business, Law and Pedagogy, ICBLP 2019, 13-15 February 2019, Sidoarjo, Indonesia. http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.16-10-2019.163223
Azer, S. A. & Azer, S. (2019). Top-cited articles in medical professionalism: A bibliometric analysis versus altmetric scores. BMJ Open, 9(7), e029433. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029433
Bar-Ilan, J. (2014). JASIST@ Mendeley revisited. In Altmetrics14: Expanding impacts and metrics, Workshop at Web Science Conference 2014. (Vol. 1031681). https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1031681
BasirianJahromi, R., Arfaeinia, H., Seyyed Hosseini, S., Torabi, F., Sangari, M. & Khosravi, A. (2022). The articles published in web of science by middle eastern researchers in waterpipe/cigarette smoking: An altmetrics study. International Journal of Information Science and Management (IJISM), 20(4), 103-116. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.20088302.2022.20.4.7.6
Connell, N. T., Weyand, A. C. & Barnes, G. D. (2022). Use of social media in the practice of medicine. The American Journal of Medicine, 135(2), 138-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2021.08.030
Costas, R., Zahedi, Z. & Wouters, P. (2015). Do “altmetrics” correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(10), 2003-2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23309
Dai, C., Chen, Q., Wan, T., Liu, F., Gong, Y. & Wang, Q. (2021). Literary runaway: Increasingly more references cited per academic research article from 1980 to 2019. Plos ONE, 16(8), e0255849. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255849
Dixon, D. L. & Baker, W. L. (2020). Short‐term impact of Altmetric Attention Scores on citation counts in selected major pharmacy journals. Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy, 3(1), 10-14. https://doi.org/10.1002/jac5.1141
Erfanmanesh, M. A. (2017). The presence of Iranian information science and library science articles in social media: An altmetric study. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 32(2), 349-73. [in Persian]
Erfanmanesh, M. A. (2018). The relationship between altmetric activity and quality indicators of the library and information science journals in Scopus. Librarianship and Information Organization Studies, 29(2), 7-26. [in Persian]
Esmaeilpour-Bandboni, M., Batooli, Z., Ramezani, A., Ranjbar-Pirmousa, Z. & Ramezani, F. (2016). An assessment of altmetrics indicators on the citation rate of articles affiliated by Guilan University of Medical Sciences. Health Information Management, 13(5), 367-372. Retrieved from https://him.mui.ac.ir/article_11537_3ea816621e0d8ecd5e534ec28051d4d5.pdf  [in Persian]
Fang, Z., Costas, R. & Wouters, P. (2022). User engagement with scholarly tweets of scientific papers: A large-scale and cross-disciplinary analysis. Scientometrics, 127(8), 4523-4546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04468-6
Floyd, A. R., Wiley, Z. C., Boyd, C. J. & Roth, C. G. (2021). Examining the relationship between altmetric score and traditional bibliometrics in the pathology literature. Journal of Pathology Informatics, 12(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.4103/jpi.jpi_81_20
Francke, H. & Hammarfelt, B. (2022). Competitive exposure and existential recognition: Visibility and legitimacy on academic social networking sites. Research Evaluation, 31(4), 429-437. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvab043
Hamzehgardeshi, Z., Elyasi, F., Moosazadeh, M., Ahmadi, I., Ahmadian, M. & Ansari, F. (2021). Effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions in the enhancement of quality of life in infertile women: A scoping review. Journal of Health Research in Community, 7(2), 72-85. [in Persian]
Hassan, R., Nasr, M., Abdelrahman, H. H. & Hassan, M. G. (2024). Sharing endodontic research on social media platforms: Is it effective? A 10-year timeline analysis. Australian Endodontic Journal: The Journal of the Australian Society of Endodontology Inc, 50(3), 612–620. https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12887 
Hassan, S. U. & Gillani, U. A. (2016). Altmetrics of "altmetrics" using Google Scholar, Twitter, Mendeley, Facebook, Google-plus, CiteULike, Blogs and Wiki. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1603.07992
Haustein, S. & Costas, R. (2015). Determining Twitter audiences: Geolocation and follower count. In altmetrics15: 5 years in, what do we know? Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Retrieved from http://altmetrics.org/altmetrics15/haustein/
 Hossein Rashidi, B., Malek Afzali, H., Haqullahi, F., Abedini, M. & Eslami, M. (2017). Investigating the use of infertility services and treatments in infertile couples referring to infertility treatment centers in Iran, 2011-2013. Iranian Journal of Women, Obstetrics and Infertility, 20(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.22038/ijogi.2017.8709  [in Persian]
Khosravi, A. R., BasirianJahromi, R., Amouri, E. & SeyyedHosseini, S. (2019). The effectiveness of published articles by researchers in the fields related to the Quran and health in social networks: An Altmetrics study. Quran and Medicine, 4(3),54-62.                 [in Persian]
Khwaja, T. & Eddy, P. L. (2015). Using Mendeley to support collaborative learning in the classroom. Journal of Educational Technology, 12(2), 19-28. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1098530.pdf
Kolahi, J. & Khazaei, S. (2016). Altmetric: Top 50 dental articles in 2014. British Dental Journal, 220(11), 569-574. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.411
Maleki, A. (2014). Twitter users in science tweets linking to articles: The case of Web of Science articles with Iranian authors. In the SIGMET workshop METRICS.
Nuredini, K. & Peters, I. (2016). Enriching the knowledge of altmetrics studies by exploring social media metrics for Economic and Business Studies journals. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators (STI Conference 2016), (pp. 1137-1146). València (Spain), September 14-16, 2016. Berlin: European Network of Indicator Designers (ENID). Retrieved from https://ocs.editorial.upv.es/index.php/STI2016/STI2016/paper/viewFile/4543/2327
Orimi, J. R., Asadi, M. H., Jafari, F., Ramezani, A., Hossein Latifi, S. A., Khosravi, A., Mahmoodi, S. A., Salehi, M. & Siamian, H. (2024). Assessing the impact of history of medicine research: A scientometric and altmetric analysis. Health Science Reports, 7(7), e2186. https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.2186
Ravikumar, S. S. & Khonglam, B. (2018). Tweets of an article and its citation: An altmetric study of most prolific authors. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 1745. Retrieved from  https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1745
SeyyedHosseini, S. & BasirianJahromi, R. (2021). Iranian articles in medical ethics: An altmetric approach on social media versus a bibliometric study in scopus database. International Journal of Information Science and Management (IJISM), 19(1), 15-26. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.20088302.2021.19.1.2.8
Seyyedhosseini, S., Khosravi, A., Assadi, M., Jokar, N. & Jahromi, R. B. (2021). The online attention to certain nuclear medicine topics: An altmetrics study vs. a citation analysis. Iranian Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 29(2), 65-72. Retrieved from https://irjnm.tums.ac.ir/article_39950_9708e6fb89d51b493891dbbe73e994a8.pdf
SeyyedHosseini, S., Yazdankhahfard, M., Azargoon, M. & BasirianJahromi, R. (2024). The societal impact of the papers published in blended learning in medicine on social network sites: An altmetrics study. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 53(9), 2121-2129. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v53i9.16465
Smailhodzic, E., Hooijsma, W., Boonstra, A. & Langley, D. J. (2016). Social media use in healthcare: A systematic review of effects on patients and on their relationship with healthcare professionals. BMC Health Services Research, 16(1), 442. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1691-0
Syamili, C. & Rekha, R. V. (2017). Do altmetric correlate with citations?: A study based on the PLOS ONE journal. COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 11(1), 103-117. https://doi.org/10.1080/09737766.2016.1260815
Thelwall, M. & Nevill, T. (2018). Could scientists use Altmetric. Com scores to predict longer-term citation counts? Journal of Informetrics, 12(1), 237-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.01.008
Trueger, N. S., Thoma, B., Hsu, C. H., Sullivan, D., Peters, L. & Lin, M. (2015). The altmetric score: A new measure for article-level dissemination and impact. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 66(5), 549-553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.04.022
Vainio, J. & Holmberg, K. (2017). Highly tweeted science articles: Who tweets them? An analysis of Twitter user profile descriptions. Scientometrics, 112(1), 345-366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2368-0
Venkatesh, G. & BK, S. B. (2024). Citation and altmetric attention score of top 100 highly cited articles in health information management journals: A correlation study. Journal of Data Science, Informetrics, and Citation Studies, 3(2), 223-236.
Willinsky, J. (2006). The access principle: The case for open access to research and scholarship. Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press. Retrieved from https://wiki.lib.sun.ac.za/images/0/03/The-access-principle.pdf
Zarinara, A., Zeraati, H., Kamali, K., Mohammad, K., Shahnazari, P. & Akhondi, M. M. (2016). Models predicting success of infertility treatment: A systematic review. Journal of Reproduction & Infertility, 17(2), 68-81. Retrieved from https://applications.emro.who.int/imemrf/J_Reprod_Infertil/J_Reprod_Infertil_2016_17_2_68_81.pdf

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 18 April 2026

  • Receive Date 13 February 2025
  • Accept Date 18 April 2026