Thematic Evolution and Dissemination of Scholarly Outputs During Health Crises: A Scientometric and Altmetric Analysis of COVID-19 Research

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Professor, Department of Medical Library and Information Science, School of Management and Medical Informatics, Tabriz Health Services Management Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

2 Assistant Prof., Department of Medical Library and Information Science, School of Management and Medical Informatics, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

10.22034/ijism.2026.2047576.1660
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic represented a critical case for studying the rapid dynamics of research and its public dissemination during a global crisis. This study addresses the need for a comprehensive understanding of these changes by examining the thematic evolution of COVID-19 research and its social attention during the initial phase of the pandemic (2020–2021). A combined scientometric and Altmetric approach was utilized. Data, encompassing 16,422 articles indexed in PubMed and 1,751,396 social mentions (primarily from Twitter and news media) extracted via Altmetric.com, were analyzed. Keyword co-occurrence network analysis (using VOSviewer) and descriptive statistics were employed to identify thematic clusters, track their evolution, and measure the social reach of the publications. Findings revealed a significant shift in research priorities. Initially, the focus was concentrated on virology, clinical sciences, and public health. As the pandemic progressed, the thematic landscape broadened dramatically to encompass psychological, social, economic, and policy-related topics, signaling a shift from immediate biological concerns to broader societal impacts. Twitter emerged as the dominant dissemination channel, hosting the vast majority of social media mentions, underscoring its crucial role in health communication during the crisis. The network analysis confirmed these thematic shifts, highlighting the growing centrality of social science subjects over time. In conclusion, this thematic analysis serves as a predictive tool, illustrating how public health crises rapidly redefine research agendas, shifting them from fundamental medical science to interdisciplinary social issues. Policymakers and research managers can leverage these insights to establish interdisciplinary research strategies and enhance preparedness for future crises by anticipating the evolving socio-scientific needs.

Keywords

Subjects

Ahmed, R. & Mao, Y. (2022). Communication research on health disparities and coping strategies in COVID-19-related crises. Health Communication, 37(12), 1455-1456. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2022.2111633
Bundy, J., Pfarrer, M., Short, C. & Coombs, W. (2017). Crises and crisis management: integration, interpretation, and research development. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1661-1692. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316680030
Elmore, S. A. (2018). The altmetric attention score: what does it mean and why should I care? Toxicologic Pathology, 46(3), 252-255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192623318758294
Fang, Z. & Costas, R. (2020). Tracking the Twitter attention around the research efforts on the COVID-19 pandemic. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2006.05783
Furstenau, L. B., Rabaioli, B., Sott, M. K., Cossul, D., Bender, M. S., Farina, E. M. J. D. M., ... & Bragazzi, N. L. (2021). A bibliometric network analysis of coronavirus during the first eight months of COVID-19 in 2020. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(3), 952. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18030952
 
Haghani, M., Bliemer, M. C., Goerlandt, F. & Li, J. (2020). The scientific literature on Coronaviruses, COVID-19, and its associated safety-related research dimensions: A scientometric analysis and scoping review. Safety Science, 129, 104806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104806
Haneef, R., Ravaud, P., Baron, G., Ghosn, L. & Boutron, I. (2017). Factors associated with online media attention to research: A cohort study of articles evaluating cancer treatments. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 2, 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-017-0033-z
Ioannidis, J. P., Cripps, S. & Tanner, M. A. (2022). Forecasting for COVID-19 has failed. International Journal of Forecasting, 38(2), 423-438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2020.08.004
Maggio, L. A., Ratcliff, C. L., Krakow, M., Moorhead, L. L., Enkhbayar, A. & Alperin, J. P. (2019). Making headlines: an analysis of US government-funded cancer research mentioned in online media. BMJ open, 9(2), e025783. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025783
Mardiani, E., Riniati, W. O., Mokodenseho, S., Podomi, A. & Mamonto, J. (2024). Bibliometric analysis of hybrid and distance learning literature in the digital age. The Eastasouth Journal of Learning and Education, 2(01), 12-20. https://doi.org/10.58812/esle.v2i01.229
Moon, J. Y., Yoon, D. Y., Hong, J. H., Lim, K. J., Baek, S., Seo, Y. L. & Yun, E. J. (2021). The most widely disseminated COVID-19-related scientific publications in online media: A bibliometric analysis of the top 100 articles with the highest altmetric attention scores. Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 9(2), 239. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9020239
Nuti, S. V., Wayda, B., Ranasinghe, I., Wang, S., Dreyer, R. P., Chen, S. I. & Murugiah, K. (2014). The use of Google Trends in health care research: A systematic review. PloS ONE, 9(10), e109583. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109583
Ozuem, W., Willis, M. & Howell, K. (2022). Thematic analysis without paradox: Sensemaking and context. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 25(1), 143-157. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-07-2021-0092
Riley, C., Xie, B. & Khurshid, A. (2021). Challenges encountered in comparing international policy responses to COVID-19 and their effects. Health Research Policy and Systems, 19(1), 134. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-021-00783-1
Tornberg, H., Moezinia, C., Wei, C., Bernstein, S. A., Wei, C., Al-Beyati, R., Quan & Diemert, D. J. (2023). Assessment of the dissemination of COVID-19-related articles across social media: Altmetrics study. JMIR Formative Research, 7(1), e41388. https://doi.org/10.2196/41388
Valderrama-Baca, P., Arroyo-Machado, W. & Torres-Salinas, D. (2023). Altmetrics can capture research evidence: A study across study types in the COVID-19 literature. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.09697
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D. & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146-1151. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559
Zarocostas, J. (2020). How to fight an infodemic. The Lancet, 395(10225), 676. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30461-x

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 17 May 2026

  • Receive Date 06 December 2024
  • Accept Date 17 May 2026