Archivist Readiness to Adopt Blockchain Technology in Managing Digital Archives

Document Type : Articles

Authors

Department of Library and Information Science, Faculty of Humanities, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia

Abstract
 The adoption of blockchain technology within archival management systems has become increasingly relevant, prompting archivists to adapt their practices to accommodate its implications for digital object management. Although many countries have begun integrating blockchain technology into their archival systems, Indonesia holds the potential for more extensive and impactful applications. Despite this potential, research on the influences of blockchain technology on archives, especially about archivists’ readiness, remains limited. This study assesses the influences of archivists’ readiness to adopt blockchain technology for digital archives management within Indonesia. This study uses a quantitative research approach. Data were collected via random questionnaires distributed to 367 archivists across 22 Ministries and 23 Non-Ministry Government Agencies, covering 70.3% of the total population of interest. The study's findings indicate that archivists’ readiness positively and significantly influences blockchain adoption for digital archives management. Both cognitive and affective aspects of archivist readiness play a partial role in facilitating this adoption. These findings underscore the importance of fostering organizational environments that empower archivists as essential human resources in the face of blockchain technology's challenges and opportunities for long-term growth. A primary limitation of this study is its focus on individual readiness, excluding broader organizational factors that could shape adoption strategies and policies. Future research should consider the role of institutional commitment, belief systems, and organizational culture in supporting technology adoption.Additionally, expanding the sample to include regional archivists may enhance understanding, as differences in technology access could significantly impact readiness levels. Future studies should also encompass various archivist roles to provide a more comprehensive view of archivist readiness for blockchain in digital archives management. Finally, examining work groups within institutions actively adopting blockchain could yield practical insights into the challenges and successes associated with this technological transition.
 
 

Keywords

Subjects


Alharbi, A. & Sohaib, O. (2021). Technology Readiness and Cryptocurrency Adoption: PLS-SEM and Deep Learning Neural Network Analysis. IEEE Access, 9, 21388–21394. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3055785
Argani, A. & Taraka, W. (2020). Pemanfaatan Teknologi blockchain untuk mengoptimalkan keamanan sertifikat pada perguruan tinggi. ADI Bisnis Digital Interdisiplin Jurnal, 1(1), 10-21. https://doi.org/10.34306/abdi.v1i1.121 [in Indonesian]
Baron, J. R. & Thurston, A. (2016). What lessons can be learned from the US archivist’s digital mandate for 2019 and is there potential for applying them in lower resource countries? Records Management Journal, 26(2), 206-217. https://doi.org/10.1108/RMJ-04-2015-0015
Bhatia, S. & Wright de Hernandez, A. D. (2019). Blockchain is already here. What does that mean for records management and archives? Journal of Archival Organization, 16(1), 75– 84. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332748.2019.1655614
Chen, Y., Le, D., Yumak, Z. & Pu, P. (2017). EHR: A sensing technology readiness model for lifestyle changes. Mobile Networks and Applications, 22(3), 478–492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-017-0871-4
Fachmi, A. & Mayesti, N. (2022). Tinjauan literatur argumentatif tentang kepemilikan data arsip digital non-fungible token (NFT) pada teknologi blockchain. Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan Dan Informasi, 18(1), 144–158. https://doi.org/10.22146/bip.v18I1.3989 [In Indonesian]
Galiev, A., Prokopyev, N., Ishmukhametov, S., Stolov, E., Latypov, R. & Vlasov, I. (2018, October). Archain: A novel blockchain based archival system. In 2018 Second World Conference on Smart Trends in Systems, Security and Sustainability (WorldS4) (pp. 84-89). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/WORLDS4.2018.8611607
Gibson, J. (2021). The thousand-and-second tale of s, as foretold by Edgar Allan Poe. Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property, 11(3), 249–269. https://doi.org/10.4337/QMJIP.2021.03.00
Han, S. & Park, S. (2022). A gap between blockchain and general data protection regulation: a systematic review. IEEE Access, 10. 103888-103905. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3210110
Harisanty, D. & Anugrah, E. P. (2022). Legality of electronic archive management in realizing Indonesia E-government. Digital Library Perspectives, 38(1), 88-103. https://doi.org/10.1108/DLP-12-2020-0123 
Holt, D. T., Armenakis, A. A., Feild, H. S. & Harris, S. G. (2007). Readiness for organizational change: The systematic development of a scale. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43(2), 232–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886306295295
Kamble, S., Gunasekaran, A. & Arha, H. (2019). Understanding the blockchain technology adoption in supply chains-Indian context. International Journal of Production Research, 57(7), 2009–2033. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1518610
LaFountain, C. (2021). Non-fungible tokens, libraries, and publishers. Online Searcher: Information Discovery, Technology, Strategies, 45(4), 22-27. Retrieved from https://www.infotoday.com/OnlineSearcher/Articles/Features/NonFungible-Tokens-Libraries-and-Publishers-147856.shtml 
Law, N. W. Y., Woo, D. J., De la Torre, J. & Wong, K. W. G. (2018). A global framework of reference on digital literacy skills for indicator 4.4. 2. UNESCO Institute for Statistics information paper, no. 51, UNESCO Institute for Statistics, Montreal. Retrieved from http://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/ip51-global-framework-reference-digital-literacy-skills-2018-en.pdf
Lemieux, V. L. (2019). Blockchain and public record keeping: of temples, prisons, and the (Re) configuration of power. Frontiers in Blockchain, 2, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbloc.2019.00005
Mahendrati, H. A. & Mangundjaya, W. (2020. April). Individual readiness for change and affective commitment to change: The mediation effect of technology readiness on public sector. In 3rd Forum in Research, Science, and Technology (FIRST 2019) (pp. 52-59). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/ASSEHR.K.200407.010
 
 
    
 Nye, B. D. (2015). Intelligent tutoring systems by and for the developing world: A review of trends and approaches for educational technology in a global context. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 25(2), 177–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40593-014-0028-6/TABLES/3
Nurhidayat, W., Muhamad, W., Afiza, N., Razali, M., Wook, M., Khalil Ishak, K., Zainudin, N. M., Hasbullah, A. & Ramli, S. (2020). Evaluation of blockchain-based data sharing acceptance among intelligence community. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications (IJACSA), 11(12). https://dx.doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2020.0111270
O’Dair, M. & Owen, R. (2019). Financing new creative enterprise through blockchain technology: Opportunities and policy implications. Strategic Change, 28(1), 9-17. https://doi.org/10.1002/JSC.2242
Ogbodoakum, N., Fauzi, A., Ayub, M., Malaysia, P., Norhasni, M. & Abiddin, Z. (2022). The influence of individual and organizational factors on readiness to accept online learning among higher education lecturers in Nigeria. Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 14(3), 304-328. https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2022.14.017
Parasuraman, A. & Colby, C. L. (2015). An updated and streamlined technology readiness index: TRI 2.0. Journal of Service Research, 18(1), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670514539730
Park, Y. (2019). DQ global standards report 2019: Common framework for digital literacy, skills and readiness. DQ Institute. Retrieved from https://www.dqinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/DQGlobalStandardsReport2019.pdf
Quirion, A. (2021). What is an and why should archivists pay attention. Archeota 7(1), 10– 12. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1013&context=saasc_archeota#page=13
Rafferty, A. E., Jimmieson, N. L. & Armenakis, A. A. (2013). Change readiness: A multilevel review. 39(1), 110–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312457417
Ramos, J. (2017). FuturesLab: Anticipatory experimentation, social emergence and evolutionary change. Journal of Futures Studies, 22(2), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.6531/JFS.2017.22(2)
Ragnedda, M., & Destefanis, G. (2019). Blockchain: A disruptive technology. In M. Ragnedda, & G. Destefanis (Eds.), Blockchain and web 3.0: social, economic, and technological challenges (1 ed., pp. 1-11). (Routledge Studies in Science, Technology and Society). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429029530-1
Ragnedda, M. & Ruiu, M. (2017). Social capital and the three levels of digital divide. In M. Ragnedda, & G. Muschert (Eds.), Theorizing digital divides (pp. 21-34). (Routledge Advances in Sociology). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315455334-3
Razali, N., Muhamad, W., Ishak, K. & Saad, N. (2021). Secure Blockchain-Based Data-Sharing Model and Adoption among Intelligence Communities. IAENG International Journal of Computer Science, 48(1). Retrieved from https://www.iaeng.org/IJCS/issues_v48/issue_1/IJCS_48_1_03.pdf
Ryan, H. & Sampson, W. (2018). The no-nonsense guide to born-digital content. Facet. https://doi.org/10.29085/9781783302567
 
Shaoqin, H., Jiangtao, L. & Shangzhuo, Z. (2022, February). Research on multidimensional electronic behavior portrait technology of electronic archives based on blockchain. In 2022 IEEE International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Big Data and Algorithms (EEBDA), Changchun, China, (pp. 875-879). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/EEBDA53927.2022.9744836
Sugiyono. (2012). Metode penelitian kuantitatif kualitatif dan r&d. (12th ed.). Alfabeta. [in Indonesian]
Syawaludin, A. R. S, & Munir, R. (2021, August). Registration of land and building certificate ownership using blockchain technology. In 2021 International Conference on ICT for Smart Society (ICISS) (pp. 1-7). IEEE.
Woodall, A. & Ringel, S. (2020). Blockchain archival discourse: Trust and the imaginaries of digital preservation. New Media and Society, 22(12), 2200-2217. https://doi.org/10.1177/146144481988875
Volume 23, Issue 2
Spring 2025
Pages 95-121

  • Receive Date 20 May 2024
  • Revise Date 07 April 2025
  • Accept Date 07 April 2025