Mapping of The Thematic Domains of Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Articles in Medical Sciences of Iran Indexed in Scopus

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Medical Library and Information Science, Abadan University of Medical Sciences, Abadan, Iran

2 Assistant Prof., Department of Medical Library and Information Science, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

3 Associate Prof., Department of Medical Library and Information Science, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

4 Department of Biostatistics, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Abstract
 
Systematic review and meta-analysis articles are crucial in evidence-based medicine. The present study aims to map the thematic areas of systematic review and meta-analysis articles in the field of medical sciences of Iran, indexed in Scopus, based on NLM classification. This applied-descriptive research employed qualitative content analysis, which involved indexing and classification. The study focused on 2,237 systematic review and meta-analysis articles in the medical sciences of Iran, all published in Scopus in 2021. Data analysis was conducted using Excel software and descriptive statistical methods. The QU category, including Biochemistry, Cell Biology, and Genetics, has the most articles with 527. Coming in second is the QV category (Pharmacology) with 493 articles, followed by the WC category (Communicable Diseases) with 390 articles. Additionally, the QU category boasts the most significant number of publication sources, with 318 journals. The QV category comes in second with 284 journals, while WC ranks third with 263 journals. The results show that most systematic review and meta-analysis articles and their sources fall under the QU category. More investigations are needed to understand the growth trend of articles in these areas compared to others.
 
 

Keywords

Subjects


Bazrafshan, A., Hejazi, R., Rahmani, A. & Bastani, S. (2015). Meta-analysis of audit committee independence and financial reporting quality. Management Accounting, 8(25), 101–117. Retrieved from https://www.sid.ir/paper/198943/en [in Persian]
Brantz, M. H. & Forsman, R. (1977). Classification and audiovisuals. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 65(2), 261–264.
Briner, R. B. & Denyer, D. (2012). Systematic review and evidence synthesis as a practice and scholarship tool. In D. M. Rousseau (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Evidence-Based Management (pp. 112–129). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199763986.013.0007
Dastani, M. & Ghorbani, M. (2021). A review of COVID-19 scientific publications by Iranian researchers in 2020: A scientometrics study. Journal of Police Medicine, 10(3), 141–148. http://dx.doi.org/10.30505/10.3.141  or https://dor.org/20.1001.1.22286241.1400.10.3.7.1 [in Persian]
Djulbegovic, B. & Guyatt, G. H. (2017). Progress in evidence-based medicine: A quarter century on. The Lancet, 390(10092), 415-423. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31592-6
Eastern Illinois University (2018). Why is evidence-based practice in nursing so important? Eastern Illinois University. Retrieved from https://online.xavier.edu/why-is-evidence-based-practice-in-nursing-important/
Ejtahed, H.-S., Oveissi, V., Tabatabaei-Malazy, O., Rad, S. S., Razi, F., & Larijani, B. (2021). Analysis of Scientific Products on Microbiota and COVID-19: A Scientometric Study. Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, 30(193), 200–211. Retrieved from https://jmums.mazums.ac.ir/article-1-15996-en.pdf [in Persian]
Finckh, A. & Tramèr, M. R. (2008). Primer: Strengths and Weaknesses of Meta-Analysis. Nature Clinical Practice. Rheumatology, 4(3), 146–152. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncprheum0732
Greenhalgh, T., Howick, J., Maskrey, N., Brassey, J., Burch, D., Burton, M., Chang, H., Glasziou, P., Heath, I., Heneghan, C., Kelly, M. P., Lehman, R., Llewelyn, H., McCartney, M., Milne, R., Spence, D., Finckh, A. & Tramèr, M. R. (2014). Evidence-based medicine: A movement in crisis? BMJ, 348. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g3725
Harsanto, B. (2020, June). The first-three-month review of research on Covid-19: A scientometrics analysis. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE/ITMC49519.2020.9198316
Hatami-Yadegari, M. (2022). Scientometric study of systematic review and meta-analysis of Iran in the field of medicine and related sciences, indexing the database Web of Science. Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. [in Persian]
Ho, Y.-S. & Kahn, M. (2014). A bibliometric study of highly cited reviews in the Science Citation Index ExpandedTM. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(2), 372–385. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22974
Impellizzeri, F. M. & Bizzini, M. (2012). Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: A Primer. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy, 7(5), 493–503. Retrieved from https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3474302/pdf/ijspt-07-493.pdf
 
Kissin, I. (2014). Scientometric assessment of drugs for chronic pain, 1979-2013: Rapid growth of publications, paucity of successful drugs. Journal of Pain Research, 7, 505–514. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S67479
Kissin, I. (2015). Scientometrics of Drug Discovery Efforts: Pain-Related Molecular Targets. Drug Design, Development and Therapy, 9, 3393–3404. https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S85633
Zhi, M., Guoqi, W., Xifan, M., Shuo, C., Xiaoxie, L., Xiantao, Z., Anhua, L., Licheng, Z., Lihai, Z., & Peifu, T. (2014). Systematic reviews on reports of hip fractures in Web of Science: a bibliometric analysis of publication activity. Chinese Medical Journal, 127(13), 2518-2522. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.20132111
Murad, M. H., Asi, N., Alsawas, M. & Alahdab, F. (2016). New evidence pyramid. BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, 21(4), 125-127. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmed-2016-110401
Nadi-Ravandi, S. & Batooli, Z. (2022). Gamification in Education: A Scientometric, Content, and Co-occurrence Analysis of Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Articles. Education and Information Technologies, 27(7), 10207–10238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11048-x
National Library of Medicine [NLM] (2024a). QU (Biochemistry, Cell Biology, and Genetics) Schedule of NLM Classification. U.S. National Library of Medicine. Retrieved from https://classification.nlm.nih.gov/schedules/QU
National Library of Medicine [NLM] (2024b). QV (Pharmacology) Schedule of NLM Classification. U.S. National Library of Medicine. Retrieved  from https://classification.nlm.nih.gov/schedules/QV
National Library of Medicine [NLM] (2024c). W (General Medicine, Health Professions) Schedule of NLM Classification. U.S. National Library of Medicine. Retrieved from https://classification.nlm.nih.gov/schedules/W
National Library of Medicine [NLM] (2024d). WB (Practice of Medicine) Schedule of NLM Classification. U.S. National Library of Medicine. Retrieved  from https://classification.nlm.nih.gov/schedules/WB
National Library of Medicine [NLM]. (2024e) WC (Communicable Diseases) Schedule of NLM Classification. U.S. National Library of Medicine. Retrieved  from https://classification.nlm.nih.gov/schedules/WC
Petticrew, M. & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470754887
SCImago (2021). Journal rankings in Infectious Diseases (WC). Retrieved  from https://www.scimagojr.com/journalrank.php?area=2700&year=2021&type=j&category=2725
SCImago (2021). Journal rankings in Pharmacology, Toxicology, and Pharmaceutics (QV). Retrieved  from https://www.scimagojr.com/journalrank.php?year=2021&type=j&area=3000
Scopus Sources (2021). Sources. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/sources.uri
Shadi, S., Asadi, S. & Nourmohammadi, H. (2019). The assessment of Iranian systematic review articles in biomedical sciences based on the scientometrics methods. Health Information Management, 16(5), 260–266. https://doi.org/10.22122/him.v16i5.3971
 
 
Shannon, S. (2002). Critical appraisal of economic analysis studies. Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal = Journal l’Association Canadienne Des Radiologistes, 53(5), 251–254. Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12500374/
Stasi, A., Mir, T. ul G., Pellegrino, A., Wani, A. K. & Shukla, S. (2023). Forty years of research and development on forensic genetics: A bibliometric analysis. Forensic Science International: Genetics, 63, 102826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2023.102826
Stojic, S., Minder, B., Boehl, G., Rivero, T., Zwahlen, M., Gemperli, A., & Glisic, M. (2025). Systematic review and meta-analysis use in the field of spinal cord injury research: A bibliometric analysis. The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 48(1), 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2023.2251205
Sudhier, K. G. & Dileepkumar, V. (2020). Scientometric profile of biochemistry research in india: A study based on Web of Science. DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology, 40(1), 40–48. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.40.1.14998
Thelwall, M. & Sud, P. (2022). Scopus 1900–2020: Growth in articles, abstracts, countries, fields, and journals. Quantitative Science Studies, 3(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00177
TorabiZonouz, S., Ghasemitabegh, F., Ghorani, A., Ebrahimi Sadr, F., Mahmoud Alilou, M., & Pak, R. (2020). Psychological Impacts of the New Coronavirus Disease: A Review Paper. Rahyaft, 30(3), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.22034/rahyaft.2021.10337.1108 [in Persian]
Vaziri, E. & Feizabadi, M. (2017). Scientometric study of the Iranian medical sciences systematic reviews. Scientometrics Research Journal, 3(2), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.22070/rsci.2017.511 [in Persian]
Verma, M. K., Borgohain, D. J. & Hadagali, G. S. (2022). Scientometric Analysis of Indian Biochemistry Research during 2010–2020. Journal of Indian Library Association, 57(3), 139–153.
Wang, Y., Wang, C. & Zheng, L. (2024). Bibliometric analysis of systematic review and meta-analysis on diabetic foot ulcer. Heliyon, 10(6), e27534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27534
Zhang, B. & Fan, T. (2022). Knowledge structure and emerging trends in the application of deep learning in genetics research: A bibliometric analysis [2000–2021]. Frontiers in Genetics, 13, 951939. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.951939
 
Volume 23, Issue 4
Autumn 2025
Pages 82-101

  • Receive Date 23 November 2024
  • Revise Date 27 September 2025
  • Accept Date 27 September 2025