To What Extent Does the Number of Local Journals Indexed in the International Citation Databases Impact the Citation and Publication Volume? A Case from Iran

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Associate Prof., Islamic World Science & Technology Monitoring and Citation Institute (ISC), shiraz, Iran.

2 Assistant Prof., Islamic World Science & Technology Monitoring and Citation Institute (ISC), shiraz, Iran.

10.22034/ijism.2026.2085845.1992
Abstract
The expansion of national journal indexing in major international citation databases, particularly Scopus, has been widely adopted as a strategic policy instrument to enhance global scientific visibility and strengthen national research competitiveness. However, indexing status alone does not inherently translate into increased scientific impact, as its outcomes are mediated by structural and contextual factors such as publication quality, language of dissemination, collaboration patterns, funding mechanisms, and the maturity of the research ecosystem. In this context, the rapid growth of Iranian journals indexed in Scopus raises a critical question: has this quantitative expansion led to substantive improvements in their international scientific impact? This study analyzed 427 Iranian journals indexed in Scopus during 2021-2025. Journal identification was conducted using ISSN and e-ISSN, and extracted data included CiteScore-based quartile rankings, authorship configurations, and article-level citation performance measured through Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI). Although data for 2025 remain partially cumulative, proportional indicators and trend analyses provide robust comparative insights. The findings reveal a structural gap between publication growth and citation performance. While the increasing number of indexed journals has expanded Iran's overall publication output and attracted a growing share of foreign authors, the aggregate FWCI of articles published in these journals remains below the global average (FWCI < 1.0). Domestically authored publications, in particular, contribute to the downward pressure on overall citation impact. Although Q1 and Q2 journals demonstrate stronger growth trajectories and foreign-authored papers exhibit relatively higher citation performance, quantitative expansion has not been accompanied by commensurate qualitative advancement. These results indicate that database inclusion alone does not validate journal quality; sustained improvements in research originality, methodological rigor, editorial standards, and strategically embedded international collaboration are essential for achieving durable international scientific impact.

Keywords

Subjects

Alonso-Álvarez, P. (2024). Exploring research quality and journal representation: A comparative study of African Journals Online, Scopus, and Web of Science. Research Evaluation, 33, rvae057. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvae057
Anker, M. S., Hadzibegovic, S., Lena, A. & Haverkamp, W. (2019). The difference in referencing in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Esc Heart Failure, 6(6), 1291-1312. https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12583
Blaginin, V. A., Goncharov, M. N. & Sokolova, E. V. (2023). Going global: The scientometric development path of Russian academic journals in international reference databases. Upravlenets, 14(4), 33-57. https://doi.org/10.29141/2218-5003-2023-14-4-3
Cañedo Andalia, R. (2013). Aproximaciones al impacto de la investigación en salud procedente de Cuba desde la perspectiva de Scopus. Correo Científico Médico, 17(3), 407-415. [in Spanish]
Erfanmanesh, M., Rohani, C. S. & Abrizah, E. (2017). The publication success of 102 nations in Scopus and the performance of their Scopus-indexed journals. Publishing Research Quarterly, 33(4), 421-432. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12109-017-9540-5
Farias Borges, L. F., Fischer, B., Mazoni, A. & Bascur, J. P. (2025). The complex interplay between international collaboration and scientific impact: Evidence from the Scopus database. Cogent Education, 12(1). 2563708. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2563708
Gasparyan, A. Y., Ayvazyan, L. & Kitas, G. D. (2011). Biomedical journal editing: elements of success. Croatian Medical Journal, 52(3), 423-428. https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2011.52.423 
Gupta, S., Kumar, N. & Bhalla, S. (2025). Citation metrics and evaluation of journals and conferences. Journal of Information Science, 51(3), 570-588. https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515231151411
Hu, Z., Tian, W., Guo, J. & Wang, X. (2020). Mapping research collaborations in different countries and regions: 1980-2019. Scientometrics, 124(1), 729-745. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03484-8
Huang, D. W. (2021). Trend of international collaboration in three decades: A case study of Taiwan. Chinese Journal of Physics, 71, 202-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjph.2021.03.002
Kim, E. (2025). Does publisher volume matter? A cross-sectional analysis of Scopus journal publishing patterns. Publications, 13(2), 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications13020017
Kim, S. Y., Yi, Y. S. & Yoon, J. H. (2014). Correlation among the citation indices of Korean scientific journals listed in international databases. Science Editing, 1(1), 27-31. https://doi.org/10.6087/KCSE.2014.1.27
Kwiek, M. (2021). What large-scale publication and citation data tell us about international research collaboration in Europe: Changing national patterns in global contexts. Studies in Higher Education, 46(12), 2629-2649. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1749254
Moed, H. F., de Moya-Anegon, F., Guerrero-Bote, V., Lopez-Illescas, C. & Hladchenko, M. (2021). Bibliometric assessment of national scientific journals. Scientometrics, 126(4), 3641-3666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03883-5
Navas-Fernández, M., Abadal, R. & Rodrigues, E. (2018). Internationality of Spanish scholarly journals indexed in Web of Science and Scopus. Revista Española De Documentación Científica, 41(3), e209. (https://doi.org/10.3989/REDC.2018.3.1498
Njeri Mugwe, J. & Runo, S. (2026). Journal selection, submission, and review of manuscript. In Research Methodology in Agricultural Sciences (pp. 643-666). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-95-1892-0_27
Oh, J., Chang, H., Kim, J. A., Choi, M., Park, Z., Cho, Y., & Lee, E. G. (2017). Citation analysis for biomedical and health sciences journals published in Korea. Healthcare Informatics Research, 23(3), 218-225. https://doi.org/10.4258/HIR.2017.23.3.218
Reed, M. S., Ferré, M., Martin-Ortega, J., Blanche, R., Lawford-Rolfe, R., Dallimer, M., & Holden, J. (2021). Evaluating impact from research: A methodological framework. Research Policy, 50(4), 104147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104147
Sánchez-Pita, F., Benito-Cabello, M. & Puebla-Martínez, B. (2025). Editorial policy and the dissemination of scientific knowledge on open access-Case study: Science communication journals in Latin America. Publications, 13(3), 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications13030039
Selemani, A., Wella, K., Chen, Y. F., Vicente-Crespo, M., Uthman, O. & Igumbor, J. (2024). A Scientometric Analysis of Africa's Health Science Journals Indexed in International and Regional Databases: A Comparative Analysis. International Journal of Public Health, 68, 1606415. https://doi.org/10.3389/ijph.2023.1606415
Wang, J., Frietsch, R., Neuhäusler, P. & Hooi, R. (2024). International collaboration leading to high citations: Global impact or home country effect? Journal of Informetrics, 18(4), 101565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2024.101565
Yoon, B. H., Hwang, B. K., Jung, E. A. & Kim, D. Y. (2021). Citation Analysis of the Journal of Bone Metabolism from Korean Citation Index, Web of Science, and Scopus. Journal of Bone Metabolism, 28(3), 193-199. https://doi.org/10.11005/jbm.2021.28.3.193
Zhou, P., Cai, X. & Lyu, X. (2020). An in-depth analysis of government funding and international collaboration in scientific research. Scientometrics, 125(2), 1331-1347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03595-2
 

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 12 July 2026

  • Receive Date 18 February 2026
  • Accept Date 12 July 2026