A Bibliometric Analysis of Paradiplomacy Research on The Scopus Database Using the VOSviewer Application

Zahidi, M. Syaprin; Bin Othman, Muhammad Fuad

doi:10.22034/ijism.2024.2009654.1217

A Bibliometric Analysis of Paradiplomacy Research on The Scopus Database Using the VOSviewer Application

Document Type : Review Article

Authors

M. Syaprin Zahidi ¹

Muhammad Fuad Bin Othman ²

¹ Department of International Relations, University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia. Ph.D. Student at the School of International Studies, COLGIS, Ghazali Shafie Graduate School of Government, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia

² School of International Studies, COLGIS, Ghazali Shafie Graduate School of Government, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia

https://doi.org/10.22034/ijism.2024.2009654.1217

Abstract

This article seeks to examine the evolution of studies on paradiplomacy thoroughly. This is crucial due to the substantial advancement of this subject in international relations research. This research employs bibliometric analysis using the VOSviewer tool to examine and visually represent the progression of paradiplomacy research in the Scopus database. Within the Scopus database, a total of 214 documents from the years 1984 to 2023 were found that specifically mentioned paradiplomacy. Canada has the most contributors who discuss paradiplomacy, specifically 34 documents. Most articles on paradiplomacy, specifically 68.0%, focus on the social sciences. Simultaneously, Stéphane Paquin holds the record for the highest number of documents authored, totaling ten. From 1984 to 2023, researchers in the field of paradiplomacy focused on 15 topics. These topics included subnational government, United States, diplomacy, diplomatic relations, cultural paradiplomacy, free trade, European Union, Quebec, decentralization, developing countries, federalism, assemblage theory, foreign relations, foreign policy, and sub-state diplomacy. Regarding the advancement of paradiplomacy research, several factors contribute to its development. These factors include the implementation of decentralization in various countries and the growing recognition among sub-state actors of the benefits they can achieve through paradiplomacy activities. This study concludes that between 1984 and 2023, the research on paradiplomacy primarily examined the interests of sub-state actor entities and their paradiplomacy activities. This is evident in the 15 topics received significant attention from paradiplomacy researchers during this period.

Keywords

Bibliometric Analysis

Paradiplomacy

Visualization

20.1001.1.20088302.2025.23.1.9.3

Subjects

Scientometrics

Aguirre, I. (1999). Making sense of paradiplomacy? An intertextual enquiry about a concept in search of a definition. Regional & Federal Studies, 9(1), 185-209. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597569908421078

Akreyi, H. R. A. (2017). The Iraqi kurdistan in the post-saddam era: Security, natural resources and foreign policy activism. Iran and the Caucasus, 21(1), 92–100. https://doi.org/10.1163/1573384X-90000009

Allan, J. P. & Vengroff, R. (2012). Paradiplomacy: States and provinces in the emerging governance structure of North America. In North America in Question: Regional Integration in an Era of Economic Turbulence (pp. 277–308). University of Toronto Press. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442690349-013

Alvarez, M. (2020). The rise of paradiplomacy in international relations. E-international Relations. 1-6. Retrieved from https://www.e-ir.info/pdf/82301

Bakvis, H. & Skogstad, G. (2020). Canadian federalism: Performance, effectiveness, and legitimacy. University of Toronto Press.

Bursensa, P. & Deforche, T. (2010). Going beyond paradiplomacy? Adding historical institutionalism to account for regional foreign policy competences. In Regional Sub-State Diplomacy Today (pp. 151–172). Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

Chater, A. (2021). The Arctic paradiplomacy of Indigenous peoples’ organizations. In Mapping Arctic Paradiplomacy: Limits and Opportunities for Sub-National Actors in Arctic Governance (pp. 139–155). Taylor and Francis Inc.

Cornago, N. (2010). On the normalization of sub-state diplomacy. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 5(1–2), 11–36. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191x-05010102

Díaz Abraham, L. (2019). Intereses y compromisos internacionales desde lo local: la transformación de escenarios y perspectivas. D. Villarruel Reynoso, R. f. Lara Pacheco, CI Moreno Arellano, y MÁ Sigala Gómez (Eds.), Actores Locales, Impactos Globales: Aportes Académicos En Paradiplomacia, 34-80.

Duchacek, I. D. (1984). The international dimension of subnational self-government. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 14(4), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a037513

Dumberry, P. (2008). Quebec accession to independence and state succession relating to treaties (L’Accession Du Quebec a La Souverainete Et La Succession D’Etats En Matieres De Traites). UPDATING OF THE STUDIES ORIGINALLY PREPARED FOR THE PARLIAMENTARY COMMITTEE TO EXAMINE MATTERS RELATING TO THE ACCESSION OF QUEBEC TO SOVEREIGNTY (1991-1992), 3(2), 225–368.

Government of Ontario (n.d.). Trade and Investment. Retrieved from https://www.ontario.ca/page/trade-and-investment

Government of Quebec (n.d.). Climate Change. Retrieved from https://www.environnement.gouv.qc.ca/changements/plan-action-en.htm

Jaursch, J. (2023). Regional mobilization in international trade policy: The US states in transatlantic trade negotiations. Regional and Federal Studies, 33(1), 47–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2021.1918386

Kania, M. (2021). Sub-state governments as rising stakeholders in development cooperation. The added value of regional governments in the light of debates on effectiveness in development. European Journal of Development Research, 33(3), 604–625. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-020-00286-9

Keating, M. (1999). Regions and international affairs: Motives, opportunities and strategies. Regional and Federal Studies, 9(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597569908421068

Kuznetsov, A. S. (2014). Theory and practice of paradiplomacy: Subnational governments in international affairs. In Theory and Practice of Paradiplomacy: Subnational Governments in International Affairs. Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315817088

Lecours, A. (2002). Paradiplomacy: Reflections on the foreign policy and international relations of regions. International Negotiation, 7(1), 91–114. https://doi.org/10.1163/157180602401262456

Mattoo, A. & Jacob, H. (2009). Republic of India. In H. Michelmann (Ed.), Foreign Relations in Federal Countries (pp. 169-188). Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780773576186-009

McMillan, S. L. (2008). Subnational foreign policy actors: How and why governors participate in US foreign policy. Foreign Policy Analysis, 4(3), 227–253. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2008.00068.x

Mesa Bedoya, J. C., González Parias, C. H. & Zeraoui, Z. (2023). Evolution and research trends of paradiplomacy. A bibliometric análisis. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 46 (1), e351. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2023.1.1960

Mohammed, H. K. & Owtram, F. (2014). Paradiplomacy of regional governments in international relations: The foreign relations of the Kurdistan regional government (2003-2010). Iran and the Caucasus, 18(1), 65–84. https://doi.org/10.1163/1573384X-20140106

Nganje, F. (2016). Sub-state diplomacy and the foreign policy-development nexus in South Africa. South African Journal of International Affairs, 23(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10220461.2016.1154889https://doi.org/10.1080/10220461.2016.1154889

Paquin, S. (2002). Globalization, European integration and the rise of neo-nationalism in Scotland. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 8(1), 55–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/13537110208428653

Paquin, S. (2003). Paradiplomatie identitaire en Catalogne. les Presses De L'université Laval. Retrieved from https://www.stephanepaquin.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Paradiplomatie-identitaire-en-Catalogne.pdf [in French]

Royles, E. (2017). Sub-state diplomacy: Understanding the international opportunity structures. Regional and Federal Studies, 27(4), 393–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2017.1324851

Schiavon, J. A. (2018). Comparative Paradiplomacy. Routledge

Sharma, C. K., Destradi, S. & Plagemann, J. (2020). Partisan federalism and subnational governments’ international engagements: Insights from India. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 50(4), 566-592. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjaa017

Vos, H., Boucké, T. & Devos, C. (2002). The conditio sine qua non of the added value of regions in the EU: Upper-level representation as the fundamental precondition. Journal of European Integration, 24(3), 201-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036330220152187

Wolff, S. (2007). Paradiplomacy: Scope, opportunities and challenges. The Bologna Center Journal of International Affairs, 10, 141–150. Retrieved from https://www.saisjournal.eu/DOCUMENTS/VOLUMEPDFS/B092C4C2-ECD4-8641-E1236E621CE5BA4F.pdf

Yin, X., Wang, H., Wang, W. & Zhu, K. (2020). Task recommendation in crowdsourcing systems: A bibliometric analysis. Technology in Society, 63(August), 101337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101337

Zeemering, E. S. (2019). An agenda for comparing local governance and institutional collective action in Canada and the United States. Urban Affairs Review, 55(3), 858–886. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087417738094